Teams

Pinellas/Fantauzzo/18&Over3.5M

2025 Pinellas Adult 18 & Over Winter · 3.5 M Saturday

13 players · average NTRP 3.62 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-02-22vs Feather Sound DikmenWon 31
L#1 DoublesAlan Chin / Kevin Hennessy vs Austin Reeves / Brandon Congleton4-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesAidan Snee vs Ray Baker6-3, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKevin Fantauzzo / Barry Michael vs Randy Kane / George Frey6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesSteven Friedman / Roger Blair vs David Dikmen / Paul Faustino6-3, 6-0
2025-01-25vs Feather Sound DikmenWon 31
L#1 DoublesSteven Friedman / Jamie Dennis vs Ray Baker / Brandon Congleton6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAlan Chin / Barry Michael vs Dean Bartles / Mark Higgins6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesAidan Snee vs Austin Reeves6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRoger Blair / Kevin Hennessy vs Thomas Kurella / George Frey4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 M Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
David Freschl
published 4
3.62
Dustin Applebaum
published
3.54
Alan Chin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.45
Lukas Yilmaz
published
3.40
Franklin Boyd
published
3.37
Steven Friedman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.35
Roger Blair
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Kevin Hennessy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.27
Jamie Dennis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Aidan Snee
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
Barry Michael
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Jean Pierre DiVito
published
Kevin Fantauzzo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kevin Hennessy + Roger Blair6255% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Freschl
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
Dustin Applebaum
19W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.62
3.5
Alan Chin
22W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.54
Lukas Yilmaz
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
Franklin Boyd
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
Steven Friedman
10W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.37
Roger Blair
8W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%86%14%
3.35
Kevin Hennessy
15W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Jamie Dennis
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Aidan Snee
4W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Barry Michael
3W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jean Pierre DiVito
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.07
Kevin Fantauzzo
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.