Teams

GS - McCathran

2026 GS USTA Adult 55 & Over Fall League · 4.0 Adult Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.75 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-10-16vs GS - JacksonWon 30
W#1 DoublesJill McCathran / Dorothy Lagarde vs Cheryl Scarbrough / Donna Russell7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLisa Hansen / Sandy Hodgson vs Angela Hunt / Diana Parrish6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTine Buhl / Kathy Gordon vs Ann Gaylor / Francis Samios6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-10-09vs GS - JacksonWon 21
W#1 DoublesLaura Adams / Peggy Piggott vs Donna Russell / Barbara Ybarra6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesCourtney Russell / Sandy Hodgson vs Angela Hunt / Francis Samios1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesTine Buhl / Susan Johnson vs Mallory Jackson / Ann Gaylor6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-10-08vs GS - JacksonWon 30
W#1 DoublesLisa Hansen / Sandy Hodgson vs Karen G Anderson / Stephanie Barnett6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTine Buhl / Nurten Davis vs Angela Hunt / Francis Samios6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJill McCathran / Laura Adams vs Mallory Jackson / Diana Parrish6-3, 6-4
2025-10-02vs GS - JacksonLost 12
W#1 DoublesTine Buhl / Kathy Gordon vs Lanora Salter / Francis Samios6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDorothy Lagarde / Peggy Piggott vs Angela Hunt / Ann Gaylor2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesTraci Mason / Melinda Bruscato vs Christie Watford-Shannon / Stephanie Barnett1-6, 5-7
2025-09-18vs GS - JacksonWon 30
W#1 DoublesNurten Davis / Tine Buhl vs Angela Hunt / Francis Samios6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLisa Hansen / Sandy Hodgson vs Karen G Anderson / Lanora Salter6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSusan Johnson / Courtney Russell vs Mallory Jackson / Donna Russell4-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 4.0 Adult Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GS - McCathran411239107

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Tine Buhl
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.82
Peggy Piggott
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.81
Sandy Hodgson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.81
Nurten Davis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.74
Kathy Gordon
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.51
Traci Mason
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Courtney Russell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.49
Dorothy Lagarde
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.43
Jill McCathran
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Melinda Bruscato
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Robin Claudio
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jill McCathran + Courtney Russell134 matchesnot enough data
Tine Buhl + Nurten Davis213 matchesnot enough data
Nurten Davis + Peggy Piggott213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tine Buhl
22W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.96
Peggy Piggott
24W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.82
Sandy Hodgson
10W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%92%8%
3.81
Nurten Davis
23W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.81
Kathy Gordon
39W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.74
Traci Mason
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
47%53%<1%
3.51
3.5
Courtney Russell
16W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.50
4
Dorothy Lagarde
5W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
3.49
Jill McCathran
10W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.43
Melinda Bruscato
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Robin Claudio
1W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.