Teams

N OR-Casebeer

2023 One Doubles · 3.5 Women

3 players · average NTRP 3.83 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Jeri Finn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Deana Julka
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Kayla Casebeer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2023-08-02Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJeri Finn / Kayla Casebeer vs Becky Holzman / Tove Maloco6-3, 6-4
2023-08-01Won 10
W#1 DoublesJeri Finn / Edwardeen Hilts vs Inge Marshall / Sheila Schmidt7-5, 7-6
2023-07-27Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKayla Casebeer / Jeri Finn vs Clarice Brown / Tammy Cofield7-6, 7-5
2023-07-20Won 10
W#1 DoublesKayla Casebeer / Deana Julka vs May Graham / Christina McMenamin7-6, 6-1
2023-07-14Won 10
W#1 DoublesKayla Casebeer / Jeri Finn vs Julie Kim / Kim Wright7-5, 7-6
2023-06-26Won 10
W#1 DoublesKayla Casebeer / Deana Julka vs Dayna Jahnke-Corwin / Melissa Smith6-3, 6-3
2023-06-23Won 10
W#1 DoublesJeri Finn / Edwardeen Hilts vs Jennifer Drew / Andrea Hobi6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2023-06-16Won 10
W#1 DoublesKayla Casebeer / Deana Julka vs Diana Blebea / Kaoru Nelson6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Jeri Finn
149W–71L career
2%98%0%
3.70
4
Deana Julka
69W–28L career
6%94%0%
3.65
3.5
Kayla Casebeer
93W–63L career
not enough data

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.