Teams

GEPTA/Adult 4.0W/Hufft/FB

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule

Flight standings for 2025 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Cheryl Ledford
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.70
Cindy Blackman
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.69
Cathey Jo Alberson
usually #1 Doubles 39%, also #3 Doubles 35% · published 4
3.51
Amelia Pilcher
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.16
Elizabeth Wakefield
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Eunsook Yoo
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Helga Sauza
usually #1 Singles 46%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
Laura Lama
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Lia Shelton
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #1 Singles 22% · published
Melissa Hufft
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 19% · published
Monica Morga
usually #1 Doubles 54%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Patricia Dalbin
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 37% · published
Radel Farrah
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Rebecca Loweree
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Rossana Roacho
usually #3 Doubles 41%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Yolanda Zuverza
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Singles 22% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eunsook Yoo + Radel Farrah5167% games+7.1% vs expected
Monica Morga + Rebecca Loweree101150% games+0.9% vs expected
Rossana Roacho + Patricia Dalbin37960% games−0.9% vs expected
Cathey Jo Alberson + Radel Farrah9655% gamesnot enough data
Amelia Pilcher + Cindy Blackman3445% gamesnot enough data
Yolanda Zuverza + Melissa Hufft314 matchesnot enough data
Cindy Blackman + Radel Farrah123 matchesnot enough data
Monica Morga + Lia Shelton123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cheryl Ledford
37W–52L career · 14 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Cindy Blackman
44W–47L career · 10 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.70
4
Cathey Jo Alberson
48W–26L career · 26 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Amelia Pilcher
27W–38L career · 9 lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.51
Elizabeth Wakefield
37W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
Eunsook Yoo
71W–22L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Helga Sauza
74W–41L career · 34 lines in 2025
not enough data
Laura Lama
20W–17L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lia Shelton
141W–90L career · 35 lines in 2025
not enough data
Melissa Hufft
98W–71L career · 21 lines in 2025
not enough data
Monica Morga
70W–72L career · 24 lines in 2025
not enough data
Patricia Dalbin
99W–72L career · 35 lines in 2025
not enough data
Radel Farrah
59W–33L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rebecca Loweree
57W–51L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rossana Roacho
123W–115L career · 39 lines in 2025
not enough data
Yolanda Zuverza
53W–49L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.