Teams

Plunkett - Acac Ace Kickers

2025 Charlottesville Singles · Charlottesville Singles 4.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-13Lost 01
L#1 SinglesLindsay Bazydlo vs Makenna Edgington3-6, 3-6
2025-10-06vs BHSC VoelmleWon 20
W#1 SinglesTammy Hertel vs Mary Voelmle6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesKatherine Haskins vs Janette Murphy6-4, 7-6
2025-09-30vs BHSC VoelmleWon 20
W#1 SinglesKatherine Haskins vs Katherine Nuechterlein6-3, 6-1
W#3 SinglesStacy Moren vs Stephanie Radlick6-2, 6-4
2025-09-22vs Edgington-The Rogue BakersLost 02
L#1 SinglesKatherine Haskins vs Qian Cai6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesTammy Hertel vs Elyse Harris2-6, 1-6
2025-09-15vs BHSC VoelmleSplit 11
W#1 SinglesLindsay Bazydlo vs Stephanie Radlick6-1, 6-2
L#3 SinglesStacy Moren vs Janette Murphy1-6, 5-7
2025-09-09vs Edgington-The Rogue BakersSplit 11
W#1 SinglesLindsay Bazydlo vs Laura Zbehlik6-1, 6-0
L#2 SinglesTammy Hertel vs Lauren Reichman6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2025-09-02vs BHSC VoelmleWon 10
W#3 SinglesStacy Moren vs Stephanie Radlick3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-08-26Lost 01
L#1 SinglesTammy Hertel vs Makenna Edgington2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Singles 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Lindsay Bazydlo
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.79
Katherine Haskins
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.74
Tammy Hertel
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4
3.72
Stacy Moren
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4
3.71
Tory Stribling
published
3.62
Mary Broden
published
3.50
Lauren Riddick
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lindsay Bazydlo + Stacy Moren3357% games+3.7% vs expected
Tammy Hertel + Lindsay Bazydlo8555% gamesnot enough data
Katherine Haskins + Tammy Hertel10163% gamesnot enough data
Katherine Haskins + Lindsay Bazydlo134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Lindsay Bazydlo
404W–144L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.97
4
Katherine Haskins
100W–65L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Tammy Hertel
150W–110L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.74
4
Stacy Moren
166W–100L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Tory Stribling
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
Mary Broden
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.62
Lauren Riddick
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.50

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.