Teams

Serve It Up

2023 Washington D.C. Singles · Washington D.C. Singles 3.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-08-27vs Piney RunWon 21
W#1 SinglesTin Ho vs Thomas Calhoun6-1, 5-2
L#2 SinglesLam Huynh vs Joel Hardi1-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 SinglesGifford Wong vs Michael Bailey7-5, 3-4
2023-08-19vs TerminettersLost 12
W#1 SinglesTed Kim vs Neeraj Gupta6-3, 2-3
L#2 SinglesPeter Tice vs Elliot Mamet4-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesPeter Levine vs John Burns0-6, 1-6
2023-08-12vs AcesWon 20
W#1 SinglesTed Kim vs Adnan Karimi6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesLam Huynh vs Owen Despagne1-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-08-05vs Piney RunLost 02
L#2 SinglesGifford Wong vs Malcolm Magee6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesPeter Tice vs Mark Hill1-6, 0-6
2023-07-29vs TerminettersWon 30
W#1 SinglesTin Ho vs Salvatore Scanio6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesPeter Levine vs Sergei Freidzon6-3, 1-2
W#3 SinglesDaren Bakst vs Desmond LaMar6-2, 6-1
2023-07-22vs AcesSplit 11
L#1 SinglesPeter Levine vs Bryan Bassig1-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesTin Ho vs Jon Anders6-3, 6-0
2023-07-16vs Piney RunLost 03
L#1 SinglesTin Ho vs Christopher Banks2-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesDaren Bakst vs Joel Hardi5-7, 0-1
L#3 SinglesLam Huynh vs Michael Bailey3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-07-15vs TerminettersLost 02
L#1 SinglesGifford Wong vs Sergei Freidzon6-4, 1-3
L#3 SinglesPeter Levine vs Elliot Mamet2-6, 1-6
2023-07-08vs AcesWon 20
W#2 SinglesGifford Wong vs Lycurtis Wortham6-4, 3-2
W#3 SinglesDaren Bakst vs Owen Despagne6-0, 3-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Washington D.C. Singles 3.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Serve It Up54121534220
2Aces45131429203

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Lam Huynh
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
Daren Bakst
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.63
Peter Tice
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
Gifford Wong
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Peter Levine
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Ted Kim
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Tin Ho
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lam Huynh
24W–27L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Daren Bakst
14W–21L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Peter Tice
45W–74L career · 2 lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
2.63
Gifford Wong
9W–4L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Peter Levine
9W–26L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Ted Kim
14W–7L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Tin Ho
8W–14L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.