Teams

Get A Grip! River Hills - L. Harrar

2025 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over Day- Women

15 players · average NTRP 2.88 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
W#2 DoublesDebra Lowe / Haney Song vs Erin Posey / Carlee Revoy6-0, 6-2
2025-01-27vs Buckhorn Sweetspots - S. NewsomLost 01
L#2 DoublesLaurie Harrar / Debra Lowe vs Sara Newsom / Stacy Durbin2-6, 4-6
2025-01-13vs PC Triple F Gals - J. WyckoffLost 01
L#2 DoublesDebra Lowe / Ellie Dahl vs Barbara Dolan / Amy Flaherty4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 & Over Day- Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Ann Dunleavy
published 3
2.99
Wendy Dobreff
published
2.91
Laurie Harrar
published
2.90
Haney Song
published 3
2.89
Debra Lowe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Pojjamarn Simos
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.75
Christine Cruz
published 3
Alison Lankes
published 3
2.62
Monty Mann
published
2.55
Keiko Kato
published
2.48
Lindsey Vance
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.45
Carrie Renter
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.36
Christine Coyle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.25
Dorothy Flair
published 2.5
Lisa Pascoli
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wendy Dobreff + Laurie Harrar9165% games+6.6% vs expected
Wendy Dobreff + Haney Song303 matchesnot enough data
Christine Coyle + Lindsey Vance303 matchesnot enough data
Laurie Harrar + Haney Song213 matchesnot enough data
Haney Song + Ann Dunleavy213 matchesnot enough data
Haney Song + Pojjamarn Simos213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ann Dunleavy
41W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.07
Wendy Dobreff
19W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
2.99
Laurie Harrar
15W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%23%
2.91
3
Haney Song
19W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.90
3
Debra Lowe
57W–46L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.89
Pojjamarn Simos
25W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%2%98%
2.77
3
Christine Cruz
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Alison Lankes
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Monty Mann
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.62
Keiko Kato
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
2.55
Lindsey Vance
6W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%56%44%
2.48
3
Carrie Renter
5W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
2.45
2.5
Christine Coyle
9W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%86%14%
2.36
2.5
Dorothy Flair
10W–18L career · no lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.25
Lisa Pascoli
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.