Teams

Namie/55s/6.5/SC

2025 Man · Cov Southern Combo 55 & Over - Women Day

19 players · average NTRP 3.38 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Cov Southern Combo 55 & Over - Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Allyson Davis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.03
Denise Weed
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.98
Berrill Vogt
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.92
Cathy West
usually #3 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published 3
2.72
Lorri Mayhall
published
Donna Mott
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Jamie Hill
published
Jan Greer
published
Karie Tillman
usually #3 Doubles 65%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Kathy Farrow
published
Kim Moser
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Leigh Hardy
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Michelle Ricotta
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Nancy Hewitt
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 28% · published
Sheila Wittie
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Suzanne Parke
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
Suzie Lambert
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
Tiffany Swoboda
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Yvette O'Krepki
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jan Greer + Yvette O'Krepki3249% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Hewitt + Cathy West1437% gamesnot enough data
Suzie Lambert + Nancy Hewitt134 matchesnot enough data
Suzie Lambert + Cathy West213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Allyson Davis
15W–8L career · 10 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Denise Weed
2W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.03
3.5
Berrill Vogt
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.98
3
Cathy West
37W–25L career · 26 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
Lorri Mayhall
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Donna Mott
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jamie Hill
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jan Greer
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Karie Tillman
10W–21L career · 20 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kathy Farrow
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kim Moser
21W–16L career · 15 lines in 2025
not enough data
Leigh Hardy
10W–17L career · 17 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Ricotta
3W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nancy Hewitt
9W–15L career · 18 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sheila Wittie
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Suzanne Parke
4W–27L career · 30 lines in 2025
not enough data
Suzie Lambert
23W–12L career · 14 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tiffany Swoboda
20W–10L career · 16 lines in 2025
not enough data
Yvette O'Krepki
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.