Teams

HV GREEN

2025 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-05-28vs HW BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesDavid Benson / James Robertson vs Richard Miranda / Kelly Bolin6-4, 3-2
L#1 SinglesReed Upson vs Michael Washer3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDustin Palmer / William Patterson vs Lane Cutter / John Miller6-0, 6-0
2025-05-21vs ATC REDWon 40
W#1 DoublesDavid Benson / Will Kerr vs Peter Ludwig / John Ludwig6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesWilliam Patterson vs Zachary Davis3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPeter Sjoberg / Matthew Nicholas vs James Turner / Ted Pomeroy7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesReed Upson / Dustin Palmer vs Russell Welty / Paul Ivancie6-0, 6-1
2025-05-14vs HFII GREENWon 21
L#1 DoublesDavid Benson / Scott Cohen vs Eric Lownsberry / Grant Baesman6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPeter Sjoberg / Matthew Nicholas vs Mark Bird / Ron Valencia4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJamie Kennedy / James Robertson vs Manu Sharma / Jon Greenfield6-4, 6-3
2025-05-07vs LTFC GREENLost 23
L#1 DoublesDavid Benson / Will Kerr vs Nam Luu / Rajneesh Verma4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesWilliam Patterson vs Clem de Fabrique Saint-Tours5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJames Robertson / Dustin Palmer vs Chris Fahlbusch / Gregory Nelson5-7, 3-6
W#2 SinglesReed Upson vs Donnie Criswell6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMatthew Nicholas / Scott Cohen vs Thomas Chalk / Richard LeJeune4-6, 0-6
2025-04-30vs SS-H REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMatthew Nicholas / Peter Sjoberg vs Quinn Hudelson / Sean Hudelson2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJames Robertson / Will Kerr vs Simon Payne / Sean Raftery2-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesWilliam Patterson vs Wade Doidge6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesReed Upson / David Benson vs Adam Woodworth / Rick Madison6-4, 1-0
2025-04-23vs WC GREENWon 31
W#1 DoublesDavid Benson / Scott Cohen vs Bob Dunn / David Tulloch6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesWill Kerr / Dustin Palmer vs Dave Donnell / Michael Martin4-6, 6-7
W#2 SinglesReed Upson vs John Mahalik6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesPeter Sjoberg / Matthew Nicholas vs Marty Bruno / Mathew Jones6-2, 6-3
2025-04-16vs SS-H GREYWon 31
W#1 DoublesDavid Benson / Will Kerr vs Monte Sutton / Kenneth Theobald6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesWilliam Patterson vs Kevin Lash3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJames Robertson / Jamie Kennedy vs Philip Bryant / Jon Johnson7-6, 7-6
W#3 DoublesPeter Sjoberg / Scott Cohen vs Sam Levine / William Johns7-6, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Reed Upson
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
3.85
Will Kerr
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.83
Dustin Palmer
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.75
James Robertson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.60
Jamie Kennedy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.58
Scott Cohen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.54
William Patterson
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
3.52
Peter Sjoberg
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
Matthew Nicholas
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jamie Kennedy + James Robertson6260% games+11.9% vs expected
Matthew Nicholas + Peter Sjoberg14362% games+4.4% vs expected
Matthew Nicholas + Jamie Kennedy3257% games−0.9% vs expected
Dustin Palmer + Reed Upson5163% games−4.4% vs expected
Peter Sjoberg + Dustin Palmer4447% games−5.8% vs expected
Scott Cohen + Peter Sjoberg3247% gamesnot enough data
Scott Cohen + Jamie Kennedy123 matchesnot enough data
Jamie Kennedy + Peter Sjoberg123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Reed Upson
36W–21L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.90
Will Kerr
7W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%86%13%
3.85
4
Dustin Palmer
35W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.83
4
James Robertson
23W–35L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Jamie Kennedy
23W–22L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.60
Scott Cohen
20W–29L career · 4 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.58
William Patterson
26W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.54
4
Peter Sjoberg
96W–52L career · 5 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.52
Matthew Nicholas
30W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.