Teams

Hawaiian Punch

2024 Fall Adult League · 4.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.65 / MAUI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-21vs Bev's Wailea 4.0WWon 21
W#1 DoublesEmily Collins / Tesha Newman vs Debra Lordan / Barbara Botkin6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesEveline Wunder vs Bichha Kato6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCelsea Marquis / Tamara Farwig vs Leslie Wilshusen / Barbara Grandon6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-12-14vs Bev's Wailea 4.0WWon 20
W#1 DoublesCrystal Graves / Jill Kanahele vs Kelly Thayer / Barbara Botkin6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAmanda Tillson / Karla Nutt vs Mina Chaikin / Leslie Wilshusen6-1, 6-4
2024-12-07vs Supah SistasLost 12
L#1 DoublesGage Beerer / Elise Chassman vs Kelly Cannon / Debbie Montgomery6-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesTracy Halbersleben vs Bettina Haerer6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKarla Nutt / Lore Lee Robello vs Janet Berglund / Susan Armstrong3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-12-03vs Marisa's 4.0WSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCrystal Graves / Ligaya Acob-Powell vs Roya Aryaee / Princess Ramos4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesEveline Wunder / Amanda Tillson vs Tana Leander / Carolyn Flam Sharp3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-11-24vs Supah SistasWon 21
W#1 DoublesLigaya Acob-Powell / Jill Kanahele vs Melanie Brown / Joyce Colleen6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesTracy Halbersleben vs Teresa Gilliland6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesTamara Farwig / Celsea Marquis vs Jeanne Dunn / Sharon Dahlquist4-6, 3-6
2024-11-16vs Marisa's 4.0WSplit 11
W#1 SinglesTracy Halbersleben vs Jennifer Goldyn6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesGage Beerer / Tesha Newman vs Nalani Cagasan / Tana Leander6-3, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Tracy Halbersleben
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.91
Jill Kanahele
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Crystal Graves
published 4
3.66
Gage Beerer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.60
Tesha Newman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.48
Eveline Wunder
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.40
Karla Nutt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
Tamara Farwig
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Amanda Tillson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Lore Lee Robello
published
Celsea Marquis
published 3
Elise Chassman
published
Emily Collins
published
Ligaya Acob-Powell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gage Beerer + Tamara Farwig7653% games−4.1% vs expected
Tesha Newman + Eveline Wunder91047% games−5.7% vs expected
Lore Lee Robello + Amanda Tillson4160% gamesnot enough data
Lore Lee Robello + Karla Nutt314 matchesnot enough data
Amanda Tillson + Karla Nutt224 matchesnot enough data
Amanda Tillson + Eveline Wunder213 matchesnot enough data
Tesha Newman + Karla Nutt303 matchesnot enough data
Tamara Farwig + Eveline Wunder123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Tracy Halbersleben
48W–38L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%61%39%
3.96
4
Jill Kanahele
252W–165L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%74%25%
3.91
4
Crystal Graves
47W–28L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Gage Beerer
83W–101L career · 2 lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.66
3.5
Tesha Newman
86W–61L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%23%77%
3.60
3.5
Eveline Wunder
61W–50L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Karla Nutt
102W–66L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Tamara Farwig
73W–85L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
Amanda Tillson
55W–49L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
Lore Lee Robello
141W–97L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
3
Celsea Marquis
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Elise Chassman
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Emily Collins
44W–30L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Ligaya Acob-Powell
58W–33L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.