Teams

CCC-Causey

2024 · 25 NEGTA USTA Adult 55 & Over - Fall

16 players · average NTRP 3.42 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 25 NEGTA USTA Adult 55 & Over - Fall have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Dancy Wynne
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.35
Barbara Griffeth
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.34
Ann Nixon
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Elizabeth Causey
published
Betsy Morris
published 3.5
3.25
Christine Allen
published 3.5
3.12
Jeanne Lewis
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.11
Terri Smiley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.06
Sherry Dubose
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.96
Maggie Bennett
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
2.94
Lynn McGee
published
2.87
Claudia Kempen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Fran Habeeb
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Janice Johnson
published
Mary Casper
published
Stacy King
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ann Nixon + Dancy Wynne14456% games+4.2% vs expected
Christine Allen + Maggie Bennett4648% games+3.2% vs expected
Ann Nixon + Barbara Griffeth2450% games+2.6% vs expected
Jeanne Lewis + Claudia Kempen1542% games−3.4% vs expected
Maggie Bennett + Elizabeth Causey2640% games−7.9% vs expected
Barbara Griffeth + Maggie Bennett2443% gamesnot enough data
Terri Smiley + Barbara Griffeth134 matchesnot enough data
Terri Smiley + Sherry Dubose123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dancy Wynne
39W–22L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.53
3.5
Barbara Griffeth
13W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Ann Nixon
27W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
Elizabeth Causey
20W–28L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Betsy Morris
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Christine Allen
8W–22L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Jeanne Lewis
33W–44L career · 6 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
Terri Smiley
12W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
Sherry Dubose
1W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.06
Maggie Bennett
13W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
2.96
Lynn McGee
12W–28L career · no lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.94
3
Claudia Kempen
10W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.87
Fran Habeeb
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Janice Johnson
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Casper
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Stacy King
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.