Teams

LA - Rally Rebels

2025 SoCal Doubles WEEKDAY - LA · LA - Women 3.5 WD

19 players · average NTRP 3.60 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for LA - Women 3.5 WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Katy Palfrey
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.88
Charlotte Gray
published 4
3.85
Brittany Blackie
published 4
3.43
Tara Zinnamon
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.42
Eriana Blankinship
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Jenny Lupe
published
3.20
Lisa Yu
published
3.18
Caitlin Neuville
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Tawny Krintzman
published
3.16
Graciela Gutierrez
published
3.13
Andrea Dunlop
published 3.5
3.11
Erica Eastrich
published
3.09
Claudine Shiva
published 3.5
3.08
Gillian Smith
published
3.07
Danielle Demianczyk
published 3.5
3.03
Krista Li
published
3.00
Vanessa Katz
published
2.88
Sirin Sanglimsuwan
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.77
Melody Hahm
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tara Zinnamon + Caitlin Neuville4171% gamesnot enough data
Katy Palfrey + Charlotte Gray314 matchesnot enough data
Katy Palfrey + Eriana Blankinship404 matchesnot enough data
Eriana Blankinship + Sirin Sanglimsuwan123 matchesnot enough data
Eriana Blankinship + Tara Zinnamon123 matchesnot enough data
Eriana Blankinship + Caitlin Neuville303 matchesnot enough data
Sirin Sanglimsuwan + Krista Li213 matchesnot enough data
Sirin Sanglimsuwan + Caitlin Neuville123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Katy Palfrey
61W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.93
4
Charlotte Gray
12W–3L career · type A · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.88
4
Brittany Blackie
7W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%14%
3.85
3.5
Tara Zinnamon
55W–18L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.43
3.5
Eriana Blankinship
80W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
Jenny Lupe
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
Lisa Yu
6W–2L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Caitlin Neuville
46W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Tawny Krintzman
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Graciela Gutierrez
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Andrea Dunlop
12W–14L career · type A · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.13
Erica Eastrich
15W–12L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
3.5
Claudine Shiva
3W–9L career · no lines in 2025
25%74%<1%
3.09
Gillian Smith
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%30%70%
3.08
3.5
Danielle Demianczyk
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
Krista Li
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.03
Vanessa Katz
11W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Sirin Sanglimsuwan
63W–53L career · 12 lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
2.88
Melody Hahm
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.