Teams

WNCC Connell (Aston)

Singles League 18 & Over NC WNC 2025 · 18+ Women 3.0 - Sunday PM

6 players · average NTRP 2.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-16vs WNCM Kusz (ARC Crowne)Lost 03
L#1 SinglesAli Hittinger vs Patricia van Vonno3-6, 1-4
L#2 SinglesCatharine Connell vs Kylie Hopkins2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 SinglesElizabeth Vega vs Marcella Lanius0-6, 0-6
2025-08-10vs WNCA Sturgill (Aston)Lost 03
L#1 SinglesCatharine Connell vs Sarah Dailey0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesSummer Barlow vs Lisa Samuelson1-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesColleen Riley vs Susanne Loar7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2025-07-20vs WNCA Sturgill (Aston)Split 11
L#2 SinglesAli Hittinger vs Sarah Dailey0-6, 6-7
W#3 SinglesLaura Martin vs Micah Nielsen6-3, 6-3
2025-07-13vs WNCM Kusz (ARC Crowne)Lost 12
L#1 SinglesAli Hittinger vs Marcella Lanius3-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesLaura Martin vs Miluska Kusz6-4, 6-2
L#3 SinglesColleen Riley vs Arwen Hawes7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2025-06-29vs WNCA Sturgill (Aston)Lost 03
L#1 SinglesColleen Riley vs Sarah Dailey0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesSummer Barlow vs Susanne Loar2-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesAli Hittinger vs Lindsay Broughel0-6, 3-6
2025-06-22vs WNCM Kusz (ARC Crowne)Lost 03
L#1 SinglesLaura Martin vs Kylie Hopkins7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesElizabeth Vega vs Jennifer Jackson0-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesCatharine Connell vs Marcella Lanius3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18+ Women 3.0 - Sunday PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.54 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.78
Ali Hittinger
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.75
Laura Martin
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
2.65
Catharine Connell
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.28
Summer Barlow
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Elizabeth Vega
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 2.5
2.23
Colleen Riley
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Martin + Catharine Connell4354% games+8.5% vs expected
Catharine Connell + Elizabeth Vega033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ali Hittinger
11W–8L career · type S · 4 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
2.78
Laura Martin
14W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%95%2%
2.75
3
Catharine Connell
17W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
2.65
Summer Barlow
0W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.28
2.5
Elizabeth Vega
0W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Colleen Riley
1W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.23

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.