Teams

SARASOTA - Longwood Wilson-Snyder

2022 Sarasota Adult 40 & Over Weekday · 4.0 W Tuesday

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-24vs LWN SherrWon 40
W#1 DoublesLenore Funes / Robyn Rhodes vs Kelly Depalo / Wanda Gilbert4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDeanna Allard vs Susan Gillis6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLynn Inganamort / Kristine Szarkowitz vs Mary Gill / Deana Antonelli-Pike6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMichelle Coates / Malika Apple vs Jenny Sherr / Melissa Huffman6-2, 6-1
2022-05-17vs SSC FeinbergWon 31
W#1 DoublesDorene Seider / Tanya Kelly vs Kristine Fitts / Joy Voke1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesDeanna Allard vs Cristina Tomadin6-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesYvonne Ghilardi / Constance Duncan vs Marsha Timm / Sara Johnson6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMichelle Coates / Malika Apple vs Brenda Dechow / Heather Chapell4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-05-10vs River Strand BeeneWon 21
L#1 DoublesKaren Collins / Kristine Szarkowitz vs Kara Beene / Nancy Finman2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesDeanna Allard vs Tie Mccullough6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesTanya Kelly / Robyn Rhodes vs Judi Wilson / Bernadette King6-3, 6-4
2022-05-03vs GT Bray RacquettesWon 30
W#1 DoublesManda Jordan / Kristine Szarkowitz vs Roda Rucks / Cathy Powell6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesDeanna Allard vs Celia Pena6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMalika Apple / Constance Duncan vs Maura Binecki / Beth Arndt3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-04-26vs Payne Park AllertonWon 30
W#1 SinglesDeanna Allard vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDonna Hannigan / Anna Bacher Brown vs Margie Stauffer / Alison White6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLynn Inganamort / Michelle Coates vs Paula Brown / Teresa Noa6-1, 6-3
2022-04-19vs Mission Valley MooneyWon 21
W#1 DoublesDeanna Allard / Dorene Seider vs Brenda Hibbeln / Sandra Mooney6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesAna Areosa vs Angela Striffler-Pierre3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJudith Lubbers / Karen Collins vs Julie Jordan / Wendi Gengler6-1, 6-2
2022-04-12vs Payne Park TempleSplit 22
L#1 DoublesKristine Szarkowitz / Manda Jordan vs Sue Green / Jennifer Godfrey3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAna Areosa vs Lori Campbell0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTanya Kelly / Deanna Allard vs Ann Davy / Linda Radovich6-0, 7-5
W#3 DoublesDonna Hannigan / Judith Lubbers vs Kimberly LaLima / Colleen Shoemaker7-6, 6-3
2022-04-05vs LWR NicholsonWon 40
W#1 DoublesKristine Szarkowitz / Manda Jordan vs Karen Nicholson / Elizabeth Goelz7-6, 6-2
W#1 SinglesDeanna Allard vs Marina Cameron6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJudith Lubbers / Anna Bacher Brown vs Kanjana Thomas / Marcia Frost6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTanya Kelly / Robyn Rhodes vs Barbara Cogen / Sandy Severs6-1, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 W Tuesday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Ana Areosa
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.81
3.79
Constance Duncan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Michelle Coates
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Judith Lubbers
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.71
Donna Hannigan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.64
Karen Collins
published
3.63
Deanna Allard
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 4
3.60
Dorene Seider
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.55
Kristine Szarkowitz
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
Lynn Inganamort
published
Robyn Rhodes
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Tanya Kelly
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Judith Lubbers + Robyn Rhodes8458% games+3.9% vs expected
Deanna Allard + Constance Duncan291757% games+0.2% vs expected
Donna Hannigan + Dorene Seider91945% games−6.5% vs expected
Judith Lubbers + Constance Duncan23765% gamesnot enough data
Donna Hannigan + Judith Lubbers12758% gamesnot enough data
Donna Hannigan + Michelle Coates7848% gamesnot enough data
Dorene Seider + Deanna Allard6453% gamesnot enough data
Dorene Seider + Judith Lubbers3444% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ana Areosa
141W–119L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.90
4
Anna Bacher Brown
11W–12L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Constance Duncan
148W–117L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Michelle Coates
52W–53L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Judith Lubbers
220W–129L career · 3 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Donna Hannigan
147W–127L career · 2 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.71
Karen Collins
6W–7L career · no lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
3.64
4
Deanna Allard
122W–106L career · 8 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.63
4
Dorene Seider
109W–119L career · 2 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Kristine Szarkowitz
30W–50L career · 5 lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
3.55
Lynn Inganamort
4W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Robyn Rhodes
71W–75L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tanya Kelly
65W–44L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.