Teams

Williams/Knoxville

2025 Adult 18 & Over-Knoxville · 4.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-13vs Browning/KnoxvilleLost 23
L#1 DoublesSandi Wilson / Nazo Burgy vs Jasmine Dabbs / Lauren Clarke3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesLauren Heinrich vs Lexie Hill3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesElena Burns / Jennifer Lea vs Brooke Browning / Santana Ewers2-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesMarybeth Snodgrass vs Marianna Hurley6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJulia Slagle / Angela Strange vs Lori Brown / Bethany Hicks4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-05-03vs Huffman/KnoxvilleWon 32
W#1 DoublesLisa Gangelhoff / Jennifer Lea vs LOURDES BLANDINO / Donna Walker6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLauren Heinrich vs Maja Lugonjic6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesTammy Simpson / Stacy Carlson vs Debi English / Emily Smead1-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesElena Burns vs Angela Cool6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesSandi Wilson / Nicole White vs Megan Haselschwerdt / Gabriella Rimmer1-6, 3-6
2025-04-26vs Browning/KnoxvilleLost 14
L#1 DoublesJulia Slagle / Angela Strange vs Brooke Browning / Kris Gompert2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMarybeth Snodgrass vs Sara Wallingford6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNazo Burgy / Brooke Williams vs Leigh Henderson / Lisa Perkey6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 SinglesLauren Heinrich vs Morgan Smith4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMadison Costner / Victoria Sissom vs Bethany Hicks / Joan Ewers3-6, 3-6
2025-04-14vs Huffman/KnoxvilleWon 50
W#1 DoublesSandi Wilson / Angela Strange vs Jennifer Bell / Debi English6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLauren Heinrich vs Gabriella Rimmer7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMadison Costner / Julia Slagle vs Lisa Huffman / Lindsey Stimets6-0, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesVictoria Sissom vs Maja Lugonjic6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNicole White / Stacy Carlson vs Mindi Bowling / Cindi Mooney6-3, 6-4
2025-04-05vs Browning/KnoxvilleLost 23
W#1 DoublesJulia Slagle / Angela Strange vs Kris Gompert / Lauren Clarke6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesLauren Heinrich vs Lexie Hill0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesBrooke Williams / Nazo Burgy vs Jasmine Dabbs / Morgan Smith6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesLisa Gangelhoff vs Sara Wallingford5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesElena Burns / Tammy Simpson vs Santana Ewers / Joan Ewers1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-03-08vs Huffman/KnoxvilleWon 50
W#1 DoublesBrooke Williams / Victoria Sissom vs LOURDES BLANDINO / Cindi Mooney6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesLauren Heinrich vs Lindsey Stimets6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAngela Strange / Stacy Carlson vs Lisa Huffman / Megan Haselschwerdt6-2, 7-5
W#2 SinglesLisa Gangelhoff vs Maja Lugonjic7-6, 7-6
W#3 DoublesJulia Slagle / Jennifer Lea vs Emily Smead / Mindi Bowling7-5, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Angela Strange
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.89
Nazo Burgy
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.81
Julia Slagle
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.81
Victoria Sissom
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.65
Sandi Wilson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.63
Marybeth Snodgrass
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.61
Lauren Heinrich
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published
3.50
Tammy Simpson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.44
Elena Burns
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.44
Lisa Gangelhoff
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.18
Stacy Carlson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.07
Jennifer Lea
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Madison Costner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angela Strange + Stacy Carlson14754% games+5.0% vs expected
Angela Strange + Julia Slagle4554% games+2.6% vs expected
Elena Burns + Jennifer Lea5447% games+0.4% vs expected
Angela Strange + Sandi Wilson213 matchesnot enough data
Julia Slagle + Tammy Simpson303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Angela Strange
56W–40L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.91
4
Nazo Burgy
116W–68L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.89
Julia Slagle
27W–20L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.81
Victoria Sissom
18W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.81
Sandi Wilson
33W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.65
Marybeth Snodgrass
31W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%84%<1%
3.63
Lauren Heinrich
8W–10L career · 6 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.61
Tammy Simpson
36W–36L career · 2 lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.50
4
Elena Burns
21W–34L career · 3 lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
3.44
Lisa Gangelhoff
8W–29L career · 3 lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
3.44
Stacy Carlson
44W–40L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.18
Jennifer Lea
23W–42L career · 3 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.07
Madison Costner
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.