Teams

TOC.Horowitz

2023 CTRL Combo Doubles 40 & Over · Combo 40 & Over 6.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-10-18vs PW.HaywardSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJamie Huang / Eduardo Delossantos vs Lou Hensley / Alan Shepherd6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesDaniel Horowitz / Sud Ramasamy vs John Kruszewski / Todd Younkin3-6, 2-6
2023-09-25vs MD.FrederickLost 02
L#2 DoublesChip Pope / Mohammed Dessouky vs Jonathan Fisher / Lukas Jantac4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesDaniel Horowitz / Sud Ramasamy vs David Lewis / Scott Ulrich5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2023-09-16vs LOCH.KasbergWon 10
W#1 DoublesChip Pope / Eduardo Delossantos vs Daryn Watson / Kenneth Waters6-4, 6-1
2023-09-02vs PW.HaywardLost 01
L#2 DoublesSud Ramasamy / Eduardo Delossantos vs Colin Hayward / William Coley2-6, 2-6
2023-08-26vs CAS.LabieWon 21
W#1 DoublesMohammed Dessouky / Chip Pope vs Thomas Brugler / Tom Roeder6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesEduardo Delossantos / Vimal Kumar vs Brett Allan / Ed Balow6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJon Rodriguez / Sud Ramasamy vs Morten Pedersen / Purish Kumar2-6, 2-6
2023-08-20vs MD.FrederickLost 01
L#1 DoublesSud Ramasamy / Brooke Ford vs Jason High / John Park2-6, 4-6
2023-08-12vs LOCH.KasbergWon 10
W#2 DoublesSud Ramasamy / Randy Davis vs Vipul Patel / Tom Broslawsky7-6, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Combo 40 & Over 6.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Eduardo Delossantos
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.14
Chip Pope
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Jamie Huang
published 3.5
3.03
Vimal Kumar
published
2.91
Daniel Horowitz
published 3.5
2.85
Sud Ramasamy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.84
Thomas Tomberlin
published
2.83
Peter Olmos
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chip Pope + Eduardo Delossantos3452% gamesnot enough data
Sud Ramasamy + Eduardo Delossantos213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Eduardo Delossantos
61W–76L career · 4 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Chip Pope
54W–99L career · 3 lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
3.14
3.5
Jamie Huang
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.13
Vimal Kumar
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
3.03
3.5
Daniel Horowitz
1W–12L career · no lines in 2023
76%24%<1%
2.91
3
Sud Ramasamy
84W–64L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
2.85
Thomas Tomberlin
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
2.84
Peter Olmos
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%10%
2.83

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.