Teams

M.Wittke

2023 Cap Adult 55 & Over · 3.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-05-01vs A.AshburnLost 01
L#1 DoublesMargo Grant / Mary Tulenko vs Deanna Drescher / Shelly Rogers3-6, 5-7
2023-04-24vs D.BrazeeWon 10
W#3 DoublesKathleen Serow / Donna Garcia vs Jeannette Congdon / Martha Herlihy7-5, 6-4
2023-04-17vs A.Whitten/BMarchiSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMary Tulenko / Margo Grant vs Mary Kelly / Mari Jameel6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDonna Garcia / Kathleen Serow vs Beverly Marchi / Carole Spencer4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-03-22vs T.LeFevre 55+Lost 02
L#2 DoublesMargo Grant / Frederica Shipman vs Tara LeFevre / Debbie Powell3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKathleen Serow / Cheryl Sweitzer vs Gwen Noble / Toni Paladino2-6, 0-6
2023-03-20vs S.Turnburke/DAbouriskLost 01
L#2 DoublesDonna Garcia / Frederica Shipman vs Diane Abourisk / Suzanne Turnburke4-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Margo Grant
published
2.89
Frederica Shipman
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.88
Mary Tulenko
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.83
Kathleen Serow
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.80
Jennifer Tun
published
2.65
Cheryl Sweitzer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Frederica Shipman + Kathleen Serow381957% games+3.6% vs expected
Cheryl Sweitzer + Frederica Shipman21034% games−7.8% vs expected
Mary Tulenko + Cheryl Sweitzer5842% gamesnot enough data
Cheryl Sweitzer + Kathleen Serow134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Margo Grant
5W–1L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%1%
3.15
3
Frederica Shipman
113W–102L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
Mary Tulenko
83W–113L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%80%19%
2.88
3
Kathleen Serow
132W–119L career · 9 lines in 2023
1%87%12%
2.83
Jennifer Tun
4W–9L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%8%
2.80
3
Cheryl Sweitzer
57W–117L career · 1 line in 2023
14%85%1%
2.65

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.