Teams

BARNETT 40s 8.5 Combo W Fri AM

2024 Piedmont Combo 40 & Over · 8.5 40 & Over Women

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-09-27Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSara Nundkumar / Maggie Riley vs Christina Rush / Jennifer Smith1-6, 1-6
2024-08-16vs Gill 40s 8.5 Combo W Fr AMLost 01
L#2 DoublesMaggie Riley / Angela McGinn vs Kristen Haynes / Sarah Joplin6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesMaggie Riley / Penny Trivette vs Natasha Hilburn / Janice Henslee3-6, 3-6
2024-08-02vs Mays 40s 8.5 Combo W Fri AMLost 01
L#2 DoublesTammy Kasik / Maggie Riley vs Jennifer Mays / Aundrea Hendley0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 40 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.19
Blair Barnett
published 4.5
3.82
Leigh Abraham
published
3.81
Sara Nundkumar
published
3.79
Penny Trivette
published
Anna Lackey
published 4
3.66
Angela McGinn
published 4
3.65
3.59
Maggie Riley
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
3.58
Alicia Noone
published 4
3.54
Tammy Kasik
published
3.33
Kara Jacobs
published
3.24
Anna Magrini
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Danielle Broadstreet + Sara Nundkumar0535% gamesnot enough data
Blair Barnett + Leigh Abraham404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Blair Barnett
15W–7L career · no lines in 2024
8%92%1%
4.19
Leigh Abraham
30W–11L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.82
Sara Nundkumar
22W–19L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.81
Penny Trivette
10W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Anna Lackey
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Angela McGinn
14W–17L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%<1%
3.66
4
Danielle Broadstreet
16W–18L career · no lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
3.65
Maggie Riley
52W–50L career · 8 lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.59
4
Alicia Noone
6W–10L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.58
Tammy Kasik
7W–8L career · no lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
3.54
Kara Jacobs
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Anna Magrini
2W–3L career · type A · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.24

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.