Teams

Savoy/Fayetteville/SRC

2022 Mixed 18 & Over · 6.0 Mixed

7 players · average NTRP 3.20 / ARKANSAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 6.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Emma Savoy
published 4
3.37
Jamia Weir
published 3.5
2.86
David Compton
published 3
2.73
Brandon Savoy
published 3
2.64
Laura Hodges
published
2.43
Leigh Verucchi
published
David Verucchi
published 2.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Emma Savoy
18W–8L career · no lines in 2022
79%21%<1%
3.40
3.5
Jamia Weir
41W–17L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.37
3
David Compton
11W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%13%
2.86
3
Brandon Savoy
2W–4L career · type M · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
Laura Hodges
2W–9L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
2.64
Leigh Verucchi
3W–33L career · no lines in 2022
70%30%<1%
2.43
2.5
David Verucchi
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.