Teams

Greenhill/Newberg-Schonwald W4.0

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Thursday League

26 players · average NTRP 4.12 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-05-15vs T bar M/Dodgen-LaRosen W4.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesKathryn Idoux / Elizabeth Chao vs Laurie Dunkin / Kiki Simpson6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCharlotte Rice / Kaylea Schultz vs Leslie Wayne / Anne-Marie Myhre6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesGianine Claure / Elizabeth Lindberg vs Lynda Ludeman / Julia McBride6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for S W. Thursday League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 22 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Angela Avila
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.04
Kerry Schonwald
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
4.01
Janine Pesusich
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.95
Ellen Oliver
published
3.94
Heather Vik
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.89
Erica Goodman
published
3.86
Kristin Rosenbaum
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.86
Charlotte Rice
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.85
Kimberly Grogan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.79
Sheela Thomas
published
3.77
Pamela Kvale
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.76
Elizabeth Chao
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Stacy Nobles
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.72
Amanda Robertson
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.71
Kathryn Idoux
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.70
Gianine Claure
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Teresa Albus
published
3.66
Ginger Newberg
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
Kaylea Schultz
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.63
Jennifer Huffman
published
3.60
Angela James
published 4
3.44
Mary Helen Nine
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Elizabeth Lindberg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Janet Apostle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kimberly Hart
published
Mariajose Alvarez
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pamela Kvale + Kimberly Grogan11161% games+13.5% vs expected
Kaylea Schultz + Charlotte Rice5063% games+7.5% vs expected
Ellen Oliver + Janine Pesusich6161% games+6.8% vs expected
Teresa Albus + Kimberly Grogan3948% games+2.5% vs expected
Elizabeth Chao + Kathryn Idoux4253% games+1.4% vs expected
Ellen Oliver + Erica Goodman6259% games+0.9% vs expected
Heather Vik + Janine Pesusich7361% games−3.9% vs expected
Stacy Nobles + Kristin Rosenbaum9753% games−5.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Angela Avila
22W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
34%65%<1%
4.06
Kerry Schonwald
23W–33L career · 5 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
4.04
Janine Pesusich
36W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
4.01
Ellen Oliver
20W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.95
Heather Vik
32W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.94
Erica Goodman
7W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.89
Kristin Rosenbaum
12W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
1%84%16%
3.86
4
Charlotte Rice
15W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
1%84%16%
3.86
Kimberly Grogan
54W–40L career · 1 line in 2025
1%85%14%
3.85
Sheela Thomas
11W–3L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.79
Pamela Kvale
37W–32L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Elizabeth Chao
9W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
3.76
Stacy Nobles
13W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
3.75
4
Amanda Robertson
21W–5L career · 7 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Kathryn Idoux
9W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
Gianine Claure
13W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Teresa Albus
30W–22L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Ginger Newberg
13W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
13%87%1%
3.66
Kaylea Schultz
17W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.65
Jennifer Huffman
3W–15L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.63
4
Angela James
16W–16L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
Mary Helen Nine
6W–23L career · 6 lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
3.44
Elizabeth Lindberg
4W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Janet Apostle
8W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kimberly Hart
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mariajose Alvarez
31W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.