Teams

SDNC WD LLW 2.5 The Santaluz Club/ Justus

2025 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SDNC WD · SDNC - Women - 2.5 (Thurs)

8 players · average NTRP 2.90 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-05-29vs SDNC 2.5 Lomas Santa Fe/ BooneSplit 11
L#1 SinglesChrystal Meyer vs Amy Szekeres6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTeri Barnes / Clara Justus vs Ina Jencks / LAUREN ADAMS7-6, 7-6
2025-05-15Won 10
W#2 DoublesChrystal Meyer / Guissu Baier vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-05-08vs SDNC 2.5 Lomas Santa Fe/ BooneWon 20
W#1 SinglesChrystal Meyer vs Anjuli Kumar6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesClara Justus / Teri Barnes vs Meredith Vytopil / April Johnson4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-05-01vs SDNC 2.5 Lomas Santa Fe/ BooneSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTeri Barnes / Clara Justus vs Meredith Vytopil / Ina Jencks3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesChrystal Meyer vs Leila Maulik6-0, 6-0
2025-04-24vs SDNC 2.5 Lomas Santa Fe/ BooneWon 20
W#1 SinglesChrystal Meyer vs Amy Szekeres6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesClara Justus / Teri Barnes vs LAUREN ADAMS / Anjuli Kumar6-4, 6-1
2025-04-17vs SDNC 2.5 Lomas Santa Fe/ BooneWon 20
W#1 SinglesChrystal Meyer vs Ina Jencks6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesClara Justus / Teri Barnes vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-04-10vs SDNC 2.5 Lomas Santa Fe/ BooneWon 20
W#1 SinglesChrystal Meyer vs LAUREN ADAMS6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesClara Justus / Teri Barnes vs Ina Jencks / April Johnson6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - Women - 2.5 (Thurs) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.58 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Chrystal Meyer
usually #1 Singles 82%, also #2 Doubles 9% · published 3
2.62
Marybelle Plourd
published
2.60
Clara Justus
published 3
2.53
Candice Donahue
published 2.5
2.49
Teri Barnes
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.33
AMY VANDENBERG
published 3
Guissu Baier
published
Kelly Schleicher
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Teri Barnes + Clara Justus1636% games−7.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Chrystal Meyer
94W–95L career · 11 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
Marybelle Plourd
4W–12L career · no lines in 2025
20%79%<1%
2.62
3
Clara Justus
1W–8L career · type A · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
2.60
2.5
Candice Donahue
16W–22L career · no lines in 2025
0%40%60%
2.53
3
Teri Barnes
16W–49L career · type A · 6 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.49
3
AMY VANDENBERG
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
88%12%<1%
2.33
Guissu Baier
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kelly Schleicher
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.