Teams

CX 8.5 NC Paulino

2025 NEOTA Combo Mixed · NEOTA 8.5 Combo Mixed

14 players · average NTRP 4.10 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-04-12vs CX 8.5 LT SimonLost 12
L#1 DoublesJodie Freetage / David Currier vs Ryoichi Fujiwara / Peyton Young0-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMichelle Dalton / Brian Hass vs Julie Samora / Jeremy Sobeck2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCora Shane / Michael Williams vs Kelsey Blatt / Douglas Snider7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2025-04-05vs CX 8.5 PM PerkinsLost 02
L#1 DoublesCora Shane / Scott Fletcher vs Adam Lee / Lisa Boucher7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSamuel Vincent / Rachel Harris vs Jeffrey Schlak / Allison Welch2-6, 2-6
2025-03-29vs CX 8.5 MV AtwellLost 03
L#1 DoublesTom Pukys / Jane Pukys vs Komila Mirolimova / Phong Nguyen2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSamuel Vincent / Michelle Dalton vs Caroline Schwartz / Adam Atwell4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesAshley Gastin / David Currier vs Jimmy Hyres / Kristin Chuko1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-03-22vs CX 8.5 LT SimonLost 12
L#1 DoublesScott Fletcher / Ashley Gastin vs Ieva Balcus / Scott KITZMILLER7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJane Pukys / Tom Pukys vs Peyton Young / Ryoichi Fujiwara2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJodie Freetage / Curtis Wagner vs David Disabato / Casye Hammer6-3, 7-6
2025-03-15vs CX 8.5 PM PerkinsSplit 11
W#2 DoublesValerie Dunlap / David Currier vs Jason Trapp / Nicole Mikolich4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCurtis Wagner / Ashley Gastin vs Adam Perkins / Amy Wilson7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2025-03-08vs CX 8.5 MV AtwellWon 20
W#1 DoublesScott Fletcher / Cora Shane vs Phong Nguyen / Milena Sterio6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesBrian Hass / Michelle Dalton vs Jimmy Hyres / Pilar Castro7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2025-03-01vs CX 8.5 LT SimonLost 12
L#1 DoublesTom Pukys / Jane Pukys vs Audrey Gregg / Akin Fashina7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJodie Freetage / Brian Hass vs Selena Kim / Jeremy Sobeck6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSamuel Vincent / Cora Shane vs Laura Engles / Masahiro Shibata5-7, 4-6
2025-02-15vs CX 8.5 MV AtwellLost 03
L#1 DoublesTom Pukys / Jane Pukys vs Ying Lin / Komila Mirolimova7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSamuel Vincent / Valerie Dunlap vs Adam Atwell / Pilar Castro6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Williams / Jodie Freetage vs Phong Nguyen / Nikki Mercer1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-02-01vs CX 8.5 PM PerkinsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesScott Fletcher / Cora Shane vs Kristina Dillon / Jordan Helderman7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMichelle Dalton / David Currier vs Adam Perkins / Nicole Mikolich1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · NEOTA 8.5 Combo Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CX 8.5 LT Simon8119824243
2CX 8.5 MV Atwell54161126223
3CX 8.5 PM Perkins36111637267
4CX 8.5 NC Paulino2781942303

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.02 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.64
Tom Pukys
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.34
Jodie Freetage
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.21
Curtis Wagner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.16
Michelle Dalton
usually #2 Doubles 88%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published
4.00
Valerie Dunlap
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.98
Cora Shane
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.93
Ashley Gastin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.68
Jane Pukys
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.67
Brian Hass
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
David Currier
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
Mel Paulino
published
Rachel Harris
published
Samuel Vincent
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Scott Fletcher
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jane Pukys + Tom Pukys71547% games−2.5% vs expected
Jodie Freetage + Curtis Wagner314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tom Pukys
46W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
14%85%<1%
4.64
Jodie Freetage
94W–37L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%88%11%
4.34
4.5
Curtis Wagner
65W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
4.21
Michelle Dalton
84W–46L career · 8 lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
4.16
Valerie Dunlap
46W–45L career · 2 lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
4.00
4
Cora Shane
84W–42L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.98
4
Ashley Gastin
104W–38L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.93
Jane Pukys
42W–42L career · 4 lines in 2025
9%91%1%
3.68
4
Brian Hass
102W–60L career · 3 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.67
4
David Currier
95W–72L career · 4 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.62
Mel Paulino
33W–52L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rachel Harris
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Samuel Vincent
25W–29L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Scott Fletcher
57W–25L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.