Teams

C.Brignac

2023 Cap Adult 65 & Over · 3.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-04-23vs P.Williams 65Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCharles Brignac / Gary Sollenberger vs David Jarzemsky / Allen McMillen2-6, 4-6
2023-04-06vs K.DeHavenWon 10
W#3 DoublesCharles Brignac / Peter Chow vs RON LOGAN / Ken Dehaven2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-03-30vs D.CaldwellWon 10
W#3 DoublesCharles Brignac / Gary Sollenberger vs John Mitchell / Richard Rubin6-2, 6-3
2023-03-23vs P.Williams 65Lost 02
L#1 DoublesCharles Brignac / Gary Sollenberger vs Greg Byrd / Allen McMillen6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTracy Behar / Peter Chow vs John Pickard / Bart White0-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-03-22vs D.CaldwellLost 01
L#3 DoublesCharles Brignac / Gary Sollenberger vs Arthur Rubin / Edward Poyo0-6, 4-6
2023-03-16vs K.DeHavenWon 10
W#1 DoublesCharles Brignac / Gary Sollenberger vs Ken Dehaven / Scott Baltz6-4, 6-1
2023-03-09vs D.CaldwellSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTracy Behar / Peter Chow vs Lance Jansen / Frank Manson6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCharles Brignac / Gary Sollenberger vs Richard Rubin / Arthur Rubin7-6, 6-4
2023-03-08vs K.DeHavenLost 01
L#1 DoublesTracy Behar / Charles Brignac vs Scott Baltz / Ken Dehaven5-7, 3-6
2023-03-02vs P.Williams 65Lost 01
L#3 DoublesTracy Behar / Peter Chow vs Ross Gordon / Peter Williams2-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Robert Simmons
published
3.23
Jairo Pacheco
published
3.21
Larry Wenger
published
3.16
Tracy Behar
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.13
Gary Sollenberger
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.12
Charles Brignac
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.06
William Turner
published
2.84
Peter Chow
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charles Brignac + Gary Sollenberger212950% games+0.3% vs expected
Robert Simmons + Peter Chow4252% games−10.8% vs expected
Charles Brignac + Tracy Behar123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Robert Simmons
14W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%<1%>99%
3.64
Jairo Pacheco
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
Larry Wenger
6W–5L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Tracy Behar
66W–88L career · 4 lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.16
3.5
Gary Sollenberger
65W–89L career · 6 lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Charles Brignac
125W–135L career · 8 lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.12
William Turner
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.06
Peter Chow
10W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
2.84

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.