Teams

MLong.55.3.5-DUR

2026 Eno River Mixed 55 & Over · 55 & Over Mixed 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.30 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-08-01vs GGlish-CHTCLost 02
L#1 DoublesBeth Clark / Robert Long vs Sara Summers / Randy Cubrilovic6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAraya Coffey / Bill Stewart vs Melissa Fitzpatrick / Gary Glish1-6, 1-6
2026-07-16vs NDraughon-YMCALost 03
L#1 DoublesCelina Morice / Bill Stewart vs Mary Parker / James White4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRobert Long / Kristine Potter vs Susana Harvey / Philip Sweigart0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesScott Jolly / Mary T Long vs Derek Saccoccio / Maya Ress1-6, 2-6
2026-07-12vs VStiebris-HSLost 02
L#1 DoublesScott Jolly / Celina Morice vs Stephen Rothchild / Jennifer Hoffmann4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMary T Long / Robert Long vs Kathy Reedy / Charles Bishop0-6, 2-6
2026-07-09vs NDraughon-YMCALost 02
L#1 DoublesScott Jolly / Celina Morice vs Philip Sweigart / Susana Harvey2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRegina Davis / Robert Long vs Deb Lanier / Stephen Vanderhoof0-6, 1-6
2026-06-11vs ABaxley-DURLost 02
L#1 DoublesAraya Coffey / Bill Stewart vs Lisa Kempf / Jeff Huxtable3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRobert Long / Kristine Potter vs Scott Zargo / Angela Baxley1-6, 1-6
2026-06-07vs GGlish-CHTCLost 02
L#1 DoublesLaura Riedel / Scott Jolly vs Sara Summers / Randy Cubrilovic3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesPete Gryson / Regina Davis vs Joelle Permutt / Timothy Buckley0-6, 2-6
2026-06-05vs VStiebris-HSLost 03
L#1 DoublesAraya Coffey / Bill Stewart vs Anna Fadel / Rick Kerns0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesPete Gryson / Celina Morice vs Charles Bishop / Millicent Snow2-6, 1-2
L#3 DoublesScott Jolly / Mary T Long vs Laura Webb-Murrah / Mark Macdonald1-6, 2-0
2026-06-04vs ABaxley-DURLost 02
L#2 DoublesAraya Coffey / Bill Stewart vs Jeff Huxtable / Tracy Lowrance2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesKristine Potter / Pete Gryson vs Scott Zargo / Kelli Harris0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 55 & Over Mixed 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NDraughon-YMCA7119513155
2GGlish-CHTC7118616171
3VStiebris-HS4415921175
4ABaxley-DUR2671734223
5MLong.55.3.5-DUR0812347288

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Celina Morice
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.34
Kristine Potter
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Laura Riedel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Regina Davis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.19
Scott Jolly
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.18
Daniel Ennis
published 3.5
2.98
Araya Coffey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.86
Robert Long
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.82
Mary T Long
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.80
Pete Gryson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.71
Bill Stewart
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robert Long + Kristine Potter3251% games−5.7% vs expected
Mary T Long + Robert Long134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Celina Morice
93W–79L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%86%13%
3.35
3.5
Kristine Potter
146W–70L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
3.34
Laura Riedel
15W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
1%92%8%
3.31
Regina Davis
36W–56L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.21
Scott Jolly
28W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Daniel Ennis
1W–4L career · no lines in 2026
9%91%1%
3.18
3
Araya Coffey
84W–80L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
2.98
Robert Long
21W–47L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%85%14%
2.86
Mary T Long
48W–104L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
2.82
Pete Gryson
0W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
94%6%<1%
2.80
3
Bill Stewart
3W–4L career · no lines in 2026
5%94%1%
2.71

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.