Teams

Jones - BBTriB

2026 Roanoke Tri-Level · Roanoke Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 upcoming · 4 played
Sep 14 9:00 AM
vs
Rivers Edge Park North
Sep 16 6:30 PM
vs
Blacksburg Municipal Park
Sep 21 6:30 PM
vs
Blacksburg Municipal Park
2026-09-02vs BaldwinLost 12
L#1 DoublesLynne Krulich / Magdalena Kanska vs Jennifer Baldwin / Jen Stewart6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesHannah Sonnenburg / Rachel Robinson vs Marie Earnhardt / Cindy Martin6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAlice Noble / Lisa Zhang vs Lizzy Sullivan / Meghan Wills5-7, 6-7
2026-08-26vs BaldwinWon 20
W#1 DoublesLynne Krulich / Nora Cross vs Tina Plotka / Hui Wang6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAlice Noble / Lisa Zhang vs Meghan Wills / Lizzy Sullivan4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-08-22vs SzechenyiLost 12
L#1 DoublesDonna Wagner / Lynne Krulich vs Julie Owen / Danielle Marshall6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTammy Crotty / Lisa Zhang vs Lisa Parulis / Tracy Hawthorne6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLeslie Harwood / Jackie McNabb vs Betty Thurman / Kristin Godsey0-6, 0-6
2026-08-12vs Jones - BBTriASplit 11
W#2 DoublesTammy Crotty / Wendy Parker vs Lindsay Szechenyi / Sharon Stewart6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAlice Noble / Leslie Harwood vs Kristin Godsey / Betty Thurman5-7, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Roanoke Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Szechenyi1021226
2Jones - BBTriB000000
3Baldwin0112432

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Nora Cross
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.67
Lynne Krulich
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Anne Jones
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.52
Donna Wagner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Tammy Crotty
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Rachel Robinson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Alice Noble
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.05
Leslie Harwood
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jackie McNabb
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nora Cross + Anne Jones3351% games+3.2% vs expected
Lynne Krulich + Anne Jones1437% gamesnot enough data
Leslie Harwood + Alice Noble224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nora Cross
18W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%72%27%
3.92
Lynne Krulich
18W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Anne Jones
32W–18L career · 6 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.63
Donna Wagner
8W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
44%56%<1%
3.52
Tammy Crotty
15W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.46
Rachel Robinson
5W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.40
3
Alice Noble
4W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%20%80%
3.12
Leslie Harwood
4W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.05
Jackie McNabb
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.