Teams

Bronwsville - Ricardo

2025 NA Valley Adult 18 & Over 2.5 M - 5.0 M - Fall · 4.5 Men

5 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-11-16vs McAllen - SiriWon 30
W#1 DoublesStephen Truman / Raul Hernandez vs Siri Anand Singh Khalsa / Carlos Rodriguez7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesGuillermo Caracheo vs Miguel Gomez7-5, 7-5
W#2 DoublesAlejandro Rivera / William Taliancich vs Rick Rivera / Luis Antonio Gomez Mendoza6-3, 6-2
2025-11-09vs McAllen - SiriWon 30
W#1 DoublesRaul Hernandez / Stephen Truman vs Sam Heredia / Carlos Rodriguez6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesGuillermo Caracheo vs Miguel Gomez6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAlejandro Rivera / William Taliancich vs Carlos Diaz-Limon / Luis Quintanilla6-4, 7-6
2025-11-02vs McAllen - SiriLost 12
W#1 DoublesRaul Hernandez / Stephen Truman vs Carlos Diaz-Limon / Sam Heredia4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSteve Cuevas vs Siri Anand Singh Khalsa0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAlejandro Rivera / Ricardo Losoya vs Carlos Rodriguez / Luis Quintanilla3-6, 4-6
2025-10-26vs McAllen - SiriLost 02
L#1 DoublesAlejandro Rivera / Steve Cuevas vs Rick Rivera / Luis Quintanilla3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRicardo Losoya / Stephen Truman vs Sam Heredia / Carlos Diaz-Limon3-6, 0-6
2025-10-19vs McAllen - SiriLost 01
L#2 DoublesStephen Truman / Ricardo Losoya vs Luis Antonio Gomez Mendoza / Carlos Diaz-Limon3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 4.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Bronwsville - Ricardo237819156

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.84 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
William Taliancich
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.88
Stephen Truman
usually #1 Singles 39%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published
3.79
Guillermo Caracheo
usually #1 Singles 44%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.74
Ricardo Losoya
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
Steve Cuevas
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ricardo Losoya + Stephen Truman2544% games−2.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

William Taliancich
35W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.96
Stephen Truman
23W–11L career · 12 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.88
4
Guillermo Caracheo
21W–10L career · 9 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
3.79
Ricardo Losoya
16W–19L career · 11 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.74
Steve Cuevas
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.