Teams

Babcock National - Intress

2025 LEECHARLOTTE Combo 18 & Over Summer · 6.5 W Thursday EVE

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_7

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
W#1 DoublesHeather Intress / Dana Meyer vs Ann Schlensker / Christina Howard6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTheresa Raker / Linda Hafner vs Janele Hyer-Spencer / Amy Newton6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDiana Barajas / Tina Hanten vs Heather Humann / Lenka Doyle4-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesDebra Stack / Lori Bieniek vs Angela Sterious / Heather Humann7-5, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesHeather Intress / Theresa Raker vs Ann Schlensker / Lana Wilson6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDiane Chilcote / Tina Hanten vs Cathleen Wei / JEANNIE THWAITES6-3, 6-4
L#1 DoublesLori Bieniek / Beth Workman vs Angela Sterious / Heather Humann4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesTheresa Raker / Heather Intress vs Heather Mazurkiewicz / Amy Newton6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDiana Barajas / Linda Hafner vs Susan Jacoby / Lenka Doyle5-7, 6-7
L#1 DoublesBeth Workman / Linda Hafner vs Heather Humann / Heather Mazurkiewicz2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesTina Hanten / Diane Chilcote vs Lana Wilson / Sandra Kent1-0
W#1 DoublesTheresa Raker / Linda Hafner vs Ann Schlensker / Heather Humann7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLori Bieniek / Beth Workman vs Lana Wilson / Christina Howard6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDiane Chilcote / Julie Osoteo vs Jodee Siriano / Angela Sterious7-6, 7-6
W#1 DoublesDana Meyer / Theresa Raker vs Christina Howard / Lana Wilson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBeth Workman / Lori Bieniek vs Marcy Till / Angela Sterious6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLinda Hafner / Debra Stack vs Jodee Siriano / Cathleen Wei6-1, 6-4
W#1 DoublesLori Bieniek / Beth Workman vs Angela Sterious / Amy Newton6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLinda Hafner / Theresa Raker vs Lana Wilson / JEANNIE THWAITES6-4, 7-5
L#1 DoublesHeather Intress / Beth Workman vs Heather Humann / Heather Mazurkiewicz3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDiana Barajas / Theresa Raker vs Amy Newton / Janele Hyer-Spencer5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDiane Chilcote / Linda Hafner vs Cathleen Wei / Sandra Kent0-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesDana Meyer / Heather Intress vs Marcy Till / Heather Humann3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLori Bieniek / Beth Workman vs Ann Schlensker / Janele Hyer-Spencer3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesTina Hanten / Debra Stack vs Lana Wilson / JEANNIE THWAITES6-4, 6-3
L#1 DoublesTina Hanten / Diana Barajas vs Heather Humann / Heather Mazurkiewicz5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesHeather Intress / Mary Bartholomew vs Lana Wilson / Sandra Kent4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDebra Stack / Diane Chilcote vs Susan Jacoby / Lenka Doyle4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 W Thursday EVE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Lori Bieniek
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.04
Theresa Raker
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
2.97
Mary Bartholomew
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Heather Intress
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.93
Debra Stack
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.81
Beth Workman
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.77
Linda Hafner
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Dana Meyer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.70
Diana Barajas
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.46
Diane Chilcote
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
Julie Osoteo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Tina Hanten
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beth Workman + Theresa Raker7557% games+7.7% vs expected
Lori Bieniek + Beth Workman2745% games−4.3% vs expected
Theresa Raker + Diana Barajas2431% gamesnot enough data
Lori Bieniek + Theresa Raker134 matchesnot enough data
Beth Workman + Heather Intress314 matchesnot enough data
Theresa Raker + Linda Hafner314 matchesnot enough data
Theresa Raker + Tina Hanten033 matchesnot enough data
Theresa Raker + Heather Intress213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lori Bieniek
132W–126L career · 6 lines in 2025
8%92%1%
3.19
Theresa Raker
23W–26L career · 7 lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.04
Mary Bartholomew
1W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
59%41%<1%
2.97
3
Heather Intress
12W–15L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
2.95
3
Debra Stack
16W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.93
3
Beth Workman
17W–22L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
Linda Hafner
4W–8L career · 7 lines in 2025
96%4%<1%
2.77
3
Dana Meyer
2W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Diana Barajas
7W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
2.70
3
Diane Chilcote
7W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
2.46
Julie Osoteo
5W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Tina Hanten
5W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.