Teams

Chimney Springs (Greg Spick)*

USTA Atlanta Summer - 18 & Over Men - Regular · 3.0 Men (D.C.)

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
W#1 DoublesBrad Stolz / Buzz Shortland vs Balamurugan Natarajan / Siva Balaji Tadiparthi6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMauricio Posada / Chris Startt vs Karthik Kalimuthu / DHINESH KUMAR RENGANATHAN6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesJosh Thigpen vs Karthikeyan Kathirkamanathan4-6, 6-2, 6-3
2024-11-23vs Windy Hill (Brian Mandigo)*Won 30
W#1 DoublesBRYAN COLCORD / Buzz Shortland vs David Braverman / Robert Buckley6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesMauricio Posada / Jeff Ballard vs Carlos Carrillo / Jordan Johnson6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesHoa Dang / Carlos Keilhauer vs Robert Glass / Marius Patterson6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men (D.C.) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Brad Stolz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.19
Josh Thigpen
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.14
Chris Startt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.11
John Tucker
published
2.98
Jeff Ballard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Buzz Shortland
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.72
Hoa Dang
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Greg Spick
published
2.64
BRYAN COLCORD
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.62
Carson Hornsby
published 3
2.58
Tim McGinley
published
Greg Giuliano
published
Mauricio Posada
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeff Ballard + Tim McGinley2442% gamesnot enough data
Chris Startt + John Tucker404 matchesnot enough data
Carson Hornsby + Greg Spick213 matchesnot enough data
Jeff Ballard + John Tucker303 matchesnot enough data
Chris Startt + Brad Stolz303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Brad Stolz
17W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.27
Josh Thigpen
9W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%9%91%
3.19
3
Chris Startt
22W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.14
John Tucker
17W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%21%79%
3.11
Jeff Ballard
16W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Buzz Shortland
2W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Hoa Dang
9W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Greg Spick
11W–14L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.71
3
BRYAN COLCORD
3W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
16%84%1%
2.64
3
Carson Hornsby
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
2.62
Tim McGinley
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
2.58
Greg Giuliano
7W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mauricio Posada
9W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.