Teams

WI Mixed 18&Over 7.0 MALT Mavlyutov

2025 WI Mixed 18 & Over · WI Mixed 18 & Over 7.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.58 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
L#1 DoublesYana Mavlyutov / Timur Mavlyutov vs Ryan Pohle / Grace Wenham2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesFarid Masrour / Sarah DeKraay vs Candice DeJarlais / Nithin Sathyamoorthy4-6, 0-6
2025-07-20vs WI Mixed 18&Over 7.0 MALT CusackLost 12
L#1 DoublesSusan Parker / Farid Masrour vs Megan Cusack / Christopher Cusack3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJulia Hazenberg / Edward Halsted vs MacAyla Schopp / Dan Bernhardt6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAmy Frederick / Jason Schleip vs Paula Riesch / Jose Nunes3-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesJulia Hazenberg / Edward Halsted vs Erin Mohrbacker / Jacob Immel5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesYana Mavlyutov / Timur Mavlyutov vs Abby Eddy / Chase Peck3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJason Schleip / Amy Frederick vs Alex Griffith / Jaryn Tuttle6-4, 6-3
L#1 DoublesChris Isensee / Julia Hazenberg vs Stephen Territo / Wendy Cartwright7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesYana Mavlyutov / Timur Mavlyutov vs Kaitlin Colver / Eli Stickney1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Frederick / Farid Masrour vs Christian Voskuil / Kathleen Roach4-6, 1-6
2025-07-11vs WI Mixed 18&Over 7.0 MALT PuttiLost 02
L#1 DoublesNicole Varo / Braden Schleip vs Amberlee Baugus / Hung Manh Nguyen3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJason Schleip / Amy Frederick vs Abtin Molavi / Molly Moritz0-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesSarah DeKraay / Edward Halsted vs Grace Wenham / John Jaeger1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesYana Mavlyutov / Timur Mavlyutov vs Candice DeJarlais / Nithin Sathyamoorthy2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJulia Hazenberg / Braden Schleip vs Kerry Berens / Ryan Pohle2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-06-20vs WI Mixed 18&Over 7.0 MALT ArmitageLost 12
L#1 DoublesYana Mavlyutov / Edward Halsted vs Diane Neukirch / Carl Sorge1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesAmy Frederick / Jason Schleip vs Karelyn Hopkins / Adam Cook4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesNicole Varo / Braden Schleip vs Anne Yates / Rob Spence6-0, 6-4
L#1 DoublesJulia Hazenberg / Braden Schleip vs Abby Eddy / Chase Peck2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesChris Isensee / Sarah DeKraay vs Jaryn Tuttle / Juanito Jerrold Acdan6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesYana Mavlyutov / Farid Masrour vs Shaina Gordon / Joe Tegtmeier2-6, 4-6
2025-06-01vs WI Mixed 18&Over 7.0 MALT CusackLost 03
L#1 DoublesBraden Schleip / Julia Hazenberg vs Megan Cusack / Christopher Cusack4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesYana Mavlyutov / Chris Isensee vs Luis Angeles / Angela Ridgely2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Frederick / Edward Halsted vs Paula Riesch / Craig Atwood1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WI Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Braden Schleip
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.49
Marjorie Baltazar
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.42
Chris Isensee
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.34
Sarah DeKraay
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.32
Julia Hazenberg
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.27
Yana Mavlyutov
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.26
Edward Halsted
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.15
Timur Mavlyutov
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.10
Jason Schleip
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.91
Nicole Varo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.91
Farid Masrour
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Amy Frederick
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Timur Mavlyutov + Yana Mavlyutov102838% games−5.9% vs expected
Edward Halsted + Sarah DeKraay134 matchesnot enough data
Chris Isensee + Sarah DeKraay213 matchesnot enough data
Braden Schleip + Julia Hazenberg123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Braden Schleip
19W–35L career · 5 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Marjorie Baltazar
183W–85L career · 2 lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
3.49
4
Chris Isensee
94W–162L career · type A · 5 lines in 2025
72%28%<1%
3.42
Sarah DeKraay
20W–29L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
3.34
Julia Hazenberg
25W–25L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%91%9%
3.32
Yana Mavlyutov
126W–152L career · 7 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Edward Halsted
24W–37L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.26
Timur Mavlyutov
111W–140L career · 4 lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.15
Jason Schleip
4W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.10
Nicole Varo
21W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
75%25%<1%
2.91
3
Farid Masrour
30W–38L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%75%24%
2.91
3
Amy Frederick
no matches on record · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.