Teams

Landings-Moesch

2024 · 2025 SATA USTA Adult 40 & Over (Men) - Winter

9 players · average NTRP 3.90 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-02-05vs RH-MalinowskiLost 01
L#3 DoublesWalter Strong III / James Breck vs John Killebrew / Daniel Gilkey2-6, 1-6
2025-02-02vs BP-BrewsterLost 01
L#1 SinglesJames Breck vs Laurent Guitton0-6, 0-6
2024-12-04Won 10
W#2 DoublesJames Breck / David Pence vs Stephen Stanley / Tim Burger6-3, 6-3
2024-11-19vs BP-BrewsterLost 01
L#2 DoublesDavid Pence / James Breck vs Bobby Braswell / Heath Graham4-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2025 SATA USTA Adult 40 & Over (Men) - Winter have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Dean Moesch
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 6% · published 4
Brian Kaplow
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.72
Walter Strong III
usually #1 Doubles 82%, also #3 Doubles 12% · published
3.69
Will Witherspoon
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
3.67
Walker Thomas Pendarvis
usually #2 Doubles 53%, also #1 Singles 24% · published
3.65
James Breck
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.63
David Pence
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published 4
3.61
Steven Hardy
usually #1 Doubles 53%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.48
Alston McCaslin
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dean Moesch + Walter Strong III181054% games+0.2% vs expected
David Pence + Dean Moesch2346% gamesnot enough data
David Pence + Brian Kaplow033 matchesnot enough data
Walker Thomas Pendarvis + Will Witherspoon123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dean Moesch
24W–18L career · 16 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Brian Kaplow
6W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Walter Strong III
18W–14L career · 17 lines in 2025
5%94%2%
3.72
Will Witherspoon
7W–19L career · 7 lines in 2025
8%92%1%
3.69
Walker Thomas Pendarvis
12W–12L career · 17 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.67
4
James Breck
6W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
David Pence
15W–20L career · 18 lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.63
Steven Hardy
15W–30L career · 15 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.61
3.5
Alston McCaslin
4W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.48

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.