Teams

CCM - Lanham

2022 Adult 18 & Over Women Fall Day - Mobile · 3.0 Women Day

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.0 Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Ellen Williams
published 4
3.30
Zue Farmer
published
3.17
Mandy Lanham
published
3.13
Kelly Picard
published
2.82
Anna Cowart
published 3
2.81
Leah Pfeiffer
published
2.79
Elizabeth Meador
published 3
2.78
Marianna Lyon
published
Deana Muscat
published 3
2.70
Noelle Engerson
published
2.49
Tricia Graham
published
Katie Wilkins
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leah Pfeiffer + Marianna Lyon3355% games+0.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ellen Williams
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Zue Farmer
44W–30L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
Mandy Lanham
23W–13L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
Kelly Picard
15W–27L career · no lines in 2022
16%83%<1%
3.13
3
Anna Cowart
14W–21L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
2.82
Leah Pfeiffer
8W–11L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Elizabeth Meador
33W–42L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
2.79
Marianna Lyon
15W–17L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
2.78
3
Deana Muscat
7W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Noelle Engerson
9W–26L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.70
Tricia Graham
7W–13L career · no lines in 2022
53%47%<1%
2.49
Katie Wilkins
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.