Teams

Cl.Duff18T

2025 Capital Tri-Level 18 & Over · 3.0-3.5-4.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.39 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-07-29vs Ka.Percy18TLost 02
L#2 DoublesSally Highsmith / Amy Clarke vs Katherine Canavan / Kathryn Kiel2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMaryKate Harris / Anna Goodmon vs Kate Pirrung / Summer DuMont5-7, 2-6
2025-07-22vs Ta.Anthony18TLost 01
L#3 DoublesSally Page / Meghan Paris vs Claire Capps / Jennifer Boney3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-07-15vs Me.Delorme18TLost 01
L#3 DoublesClaire Duff / Sally Highsmith vs Tacey Hesmer / Katherine Bratton1-6, 1-6
2025-07-09vs La.Ross18TLost 02
L#2 DoublesYvonne Barrow / Sally Highsmith vs Yuwie Hager / Kelly Townsend0-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesMaryKate Harris / Meghan Paris vs Julie Karg / Jacqueline Morgan7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2025-07-08vs Be.WoodEhrenberger18TWon 20
W#2 DoublesChristina Allen / Sally Highsmith vs Allison Crumpler / Anne Elizabeth Harrell6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesClaire Duff / Sally Page vs Mary Zimardo / Kelly Day6-1, 1-6, 1-0
2025-06-24vs Ki.Monsees18TLost 12
W#1 DoublesJennifer Badham / Kathleen Warren vs Kim von Weihe / Amy Pena6-2, 4-2
L#2 DoublesMeghan Paris / Sally Highsmith vs Virginia Griffin / Melissa Graham3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesClaire Duff / Anna Goodmon vs Abigail Douek / Jaime Gaskins2-6, 3-6
2025-06-10vs An.Willard18TWon 10
W#3 DoublesMeghan Paris / Sally Page vs Karen Southern / Debra Hauge6-4, 6-1
2025-06-04vs De.Skiko18TSplit 11
L#2 DoublesYvonne Barrow / Jennifer Badham vs Amanda Bauer / Holly Moravec4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesClaire Duff / Meghan Paris vs Jennifer Viscosi / Jade Paunovich7-6, 6-2
2025-06-03Won 10
W#3 DoublesClaire Duff / Sally Highsmith vs Terry Jones / Amy Baker6-1, 6-1
2025-05-20vs Na.Rodrigues18TLost 01
L#3 DoublesMaryKate Harris / Anna Goodmon vs Paige Alford / April Taylor2-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0-3.5-4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Celeste Chapman
published 4
3.65
Jennifer Badham
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.40
Sally Highsmith
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.35
McKenzie Keenan Osman
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.21
Christina Allen
published 3.5
3.19
Yvonne Barrow
published
3.08
Meghan Paris
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.00
Sally Page
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.99
Claire Duff
published 3
2.98
Anna Goodmon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.54
MaryKate Harris
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meghan Paris + Jennifer Badham2352% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Celeste Chapman
9W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
4.04
3.5
Jennifer Badham
88W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%13%87%
3.65
3.5
Sally Highsmith
159W–46L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
McKenzie Keenan Osman
130W–124L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Christina Allen
10W–12L career · no lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.21
Yvonne Barrow
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Meghan Paris
85W–62L career · 5 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.08
3
Sally Page
24W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Claire Duff
22W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
2.99
3
Anna Goodmon
77W–42L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
2.98
MaryKate Harris
0W–7L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
2.54

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.