Teams

Parke/18/6.5/SC

2024 Man · Cov Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Day

23 players · average NTRP 3.12 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Cov Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Amanda Mott
published 3.5
3.23
Cherie Verdigets
published 3.5
2.95
Alison Beebe
published 3
2.93
Kellie Rhea
published
2.92
Cathy West
published 3
2.84
Celeste Hart
published 3
2.82
Angelique Daigle
published 3
Caroline Allen
published 3
2.73
Jamie Hill
published
Jennifer Magness
published
Karen Judlin
published
Kelly Slimming
published
Kimberly Darr
published
Meghan DeRoche
published
Melinda Carmeli
published
Melissa Biggs
published
Monique Thornton
published
Nikki Alls
published
SHELLY GALLARDO
published
Susan Lambou
published
Suzanne Parke
published
Trisha Rovira
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimberly Darr + Alison Beebe10656% gamesnot enough data
Celeste Hart + Cathy West3549% gamesnot enough data
Melinda Carmeli + Karen Judlin4254% gamesnot enough data
Kimberly Darr + Kelly Slimming134 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Magness + Melinda Carmeli033 matchesnot enough data
Alison Beebe + Kelly Slimming303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amanda Mott
13W–14L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Cherie Verdigets
13W–8L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
3
Alison Beebe
54W–27L career · no lines in 2024
<1%65%35%
2.95
Kellie Rhea
16W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
2.93
3
Cathy West
37W–25L career · no lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Celeste Hart
10W–21L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
2.84
3
Angelique Daigle
11W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Caroline Allen
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Ann Marie Covington
19W–22L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.73
Jamie Hill
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jennifer Magness
8W–21L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Karen Judlin
29W–13L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kelly Slimming
43W–34L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kimberly Darr
46W–26L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Meghan DeRoche
15W–11L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Melinda Carmeli
12W–14L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Melissa Biggs
15W–24L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Monique Thornton
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Nikki Alls
0W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
SHELLY GALLARDO
12W–49L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Susan Lambou
2W–26L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Suzanne Parke
4W–27L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Trisha Rovira
9W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.