Teams

IE-CL-Becky Gagnon

2022 SCTA Doubles 18 & Over - IE · IE Women 4.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.83 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-10-30vs IE-CCCC-Sharon HebertWon 10
W#2 DoublesMonica Johnson / Rhianna Thompson vs Sharon Hebert / Allison Cocker6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2022-10-15vs IE-MTC-Jeanne ShelterLost 02
L#1 DoublesBecky Gagnon / Keiko Dodge vs Nicole Hollowell / Miranda Cass4-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#2 DoublesErin Furlong / Monica Johnson vs Diana Ortuno / Rebecca Cloyd1-6, 5-7
2022-10-08vs IE-LLW-VMHS-Susan BolandLost 01
L#2 DoublesBecky Gagnon / Rhonda Arendt vs Jeananne Woodman / Kathy Valdez2-6, 5-7
2022-09-28vs IE-APTC-Beverly HuntSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMonica Johnson / Rhianna Thompson vs Beverly Hunt / Saleshnie Sukhram2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAndrea Bohn / Erin Furlong vs Raquel Medina / Maria Sagara2-6, 5-7
2022-09-18vs IE-CCCC-Sharon HebertLost 01
L#2 DoublesRhianna Thompson / Andrea Bohn vs Ashley Knoblach / Amy Markham2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for IE Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Keiko Dodge
published 4
3.78
Becky Ness
published 4
3.75
Rhianna Thompson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.73
CHARLOTTE DEHESA
published 4
3.34
Becky Gagnon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.31
Erin Furlong
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.09
Rhonda Arendt
published
Melissa Connor
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rhianna Thompson + Keiko Dodge134 matchesnot enough data
CHARLOTTE DEHESA + Rhianna Thompson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Keiko Dodge
34W–25L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Becky Ness
9W–4L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Rhianna Thompson
137W–91L career · 6 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
CHARLOTTE DEHESA
145W–114L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
3.5
Becky Gagnon
61W–40L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Erin Furlong
49W–48L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
Rhonda Arendt
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.09
Melissa Connor
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.