Teams

Le.Barter18A

2024 Capital Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-05-04vs Ca.Conzola18AWon 10
W#1 DoublesLeigh Barter / Valerie Wallace vs Lisa Bakowski / Salley Huff6-3, 6-1
2024-04-20vs La.King18ASplit 11
L#1 DoublesAmy Gillespie / Liz Arcos vs Lauren King / April Bazin1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesLeigh Barter vs Christine Hughes6-0, 6-4
2024-04-13vs St.Moritz18ASplit 11
W#1 DoublesLeigh Barter / Hannah Boghosian vs Stacey Giglio / Emma Coblentz6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLiz Arcos / Amy Gillespie vs Katie Percy / Keri Urwin6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2024-04-06vs As.McCollum18AWon 10
W#1 DoublesLeigh Barter / Amy Gillespie vs Sharyn Leaver / Lisa Sun6-4, 6-1
2024-03-16vs Me.George18AWon 20
W#1 SinglesLeigh Barter vs Sara Mazurak6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLiz Arcos / Valerie Wallace vs Melissa George / Julianne Rothert6-4, 6-3
2024-03-02vs Pa.Hankerson18AWon 10
W#2 DoublesLiz Arcos / Hannah Boghosian vs Michelle Mills / Bernadette David-Yerumo6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Caroline Yu
published 4
3.86
Leigh Barter
usually #1 Singles 25%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.71
Hannah Boghosian
published
3.55
Kara Horton
published
3.44
Liz Arcos
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.41
Valerie Wallace
published
3.28
Lauren Redmond
published
3.18
Katie Masood
published
3.13
Barbara Wilhelm
published 3
2.87
Kyleigh Dunn
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Liz Arcos + Leigh Barter213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Caroline Yu
17W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
3.97
4
Leigh Barter
186W–64L career · 11 lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.86
Hannah Boghosian
20W–13L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.71
Kara Horton
5W–7L career · no lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
3.55
3.5
Liz Arcos
193W–123L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%65%34%
3.44
Valerie Wallace
10W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.41
Lauren Redmond
22W–11L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%5%
3.28
Katie Masood
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
9%89%1%
3.18
3
Barbara Wilhelm
47W–30L career · no lines in 2024
<1%17%83%
3.13
Kyleigh Dunn
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
2.87

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.