Teams

Dawson

2024 Anne Arundel Mixed 18 & Over · Anne Arundel Mixed 18 & Over 6.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.19 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-03-30vs Ball Striker 6.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesPeggy Bailey / Charles Mandeville vs Sophia Crawley / Mervin Dennis6-1, 7-6
2024-03-24vs Walsh/AbelsLost 02
L#2 DoublesLisa Mulholland / Bill Blum vs Meg Daniels / Richard Ruth4-6, 4-5
L#3 DoublesEdward Dawson / Stephanie Ruskin vs Jennifer Timian / Richard Abels6-7, 3-6
2024-03-17vs IschLost 01
L#2 DoublesCharles Mandeville / Marilyn Moore vs Kimberly Gowen / Frank von Hendricks1-6, 5-7
2024-03-16vs X-TeamSplit 11
W#1 DoublesStephanie Ruskin / Charles Mandeville vs Pamela Nieva / Patrick Bernhard4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKim Herman / David Mason vs Mary Corbiere / Xavier Estrada3-6, 4-6
2024-02-09vs IschLost 02
L#1 DoublesPeggy Bailey / Charles Mandeville vs Laura Buckley / Scott A Green3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesLisa Mulholland / Bill Blum vs Erin Isch / Andrew Isch0-6, 4-6
2024-01-26vs X-TeamSplit 11
W#1 DoublesPeggy Bailey / Charles Mandeville vs Erin Weller / Patrick Bernhard6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMark Moore / Stephanie Ruskin vs Aine McKee / Gregory Teal3-6, 0-6
2024-01-13vs Ball Striker 6.0Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKim Herman / David Mason vs Casey Royster / Calvin Braxton II4-6, 0-6
2024-01-07vs Walsh/AbelsWon 10
W#3 DoublesDavid Mason / Kim Herman vs Tom Walsh / Erin McVeigh7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2024-01-06vs X-TeamLost 01
L#3 DoublesLisa Mulholland / Bill Blum vs Emily Trochimowicz / Xavier Estrada1-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Mixed 18 & Over 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Lisa Mulholland
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Daniel Weitman
published 3.5
3.15
David Mason
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Charles Mandeville
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.94
Jennifer Mason
published
2.93
Scott Intner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.90
Marilyn Moore
published
2.85
Peggy Bailey
published
2.72
Alex Lumb
published 3
2.70
Stephanie Ruskin
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.67
Wendy Hubbert
published
2.64
Carolyn Noe
published 3
2.54
Patricia Lopez
published
2.39
Kim Herman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Mason + David Mason0530% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Lisa Mulholland
79W–68L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%65%35%
3.45
3.5
Daniel Weitman
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
David Mason
30W–61L career · 3 lines in 2024
12%87%<1%
3.15
3
Charles Mandeville
53W–25L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%27%73%
3.08
Jennifer Mason
1W–16L career · no lines in 2024
67%33%<1%
2.94
3
Scott Intner
38W–36L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%69%31%
2.93
Marilyn Moore
20W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
2.90
Peggy Bailey
18W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Alex Lumb
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
2.72
3
Stephanie Ruskin
141W–155L career · 5 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
2.70
Wendy Hubbert
18W–42L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
2.67
3
Carolyn Noe
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%<1%
2.64
Patricia Lopez
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
2.54
Kim Herman
2W–12L career · no lines in 2024
0%81%19%
2.39

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.