Teams

VTC-Savage

2023 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.43 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Sean McKinnie
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.35
Greg Mikol
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Cameron Hugill
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Phillip Heaston
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Wei Pan
published 3.5
3.21
Stephen Crook
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
2.78
Charles Stewart
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
Kurt Rylander
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 0
Results8 ties
2023-06-17Lost 03
L#1 DoublesCameron Hugill / Christopher Garcia vs Matt Zhou / Martin von Haartman6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesStephen Crook vs Sam Ko6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesPhillip Heaston / Charles Stewart vs Paul Harwood / Donny Cablao6-3, 6-4
2023-06-04Lost 03
L#1 DoublesChristopher Garcia / Cameron Hugill vs Brad Johnson / Pierre Burthey6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCharles Stewart / Wei Pan vs Sam Lumetta / Craig Hlady6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSean McKinnie / Kurt Rylander vs Masafumi Inoue / Timothy Morgan6-2, 7-5
2023-05-21Lost 03
L#1 DoublesSean McKinnie / Kurt Rylander vs Dan Boren / Ryan Manwiller6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesPhillip Heaston / Greg Mikol vs James Lawrence / Ryan Yokoyama6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCharles Stewart / Christopher Garcia vs Dale Christensen / Richard Gronostajski6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2023-05-14Lost 03
L#1 SinglesStephen Crook vs Eddie Shin5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKurt Rylander / Charles Stewart vs Anish Vidyarthi / Martin von Haartman6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMatt Savage / Greg Mikol vs Paul Harwood / Donny Cablao7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2023-05-07Split 11
L#2 DoublesPhillip Heaston / Sean McKinnie vs Gabriel Weaver / Frank Foti6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKurt Rylander / Charles Stewart vs Jeremy Oconnor / Michael Meyers6-4, 6-2
2023-04-30Won 21
L#1 DoublesMatt Savage / Sean McKinnie vs Xavier Oberlander / Christopher Robbins4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGreg Mikol / Daniel Moss-Lee vs WILLIAM KENDALL / John Baker7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCharles Stewart / Wei Pan vs Michael Navarro / Michael Parkhurst6-4, 6-3
2023-04-14Lost 12
L#1 DoublesMatt Savage / Sean McKinnie vs Jeff Streich / Ed Schwartz6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesGreg Mikol / Wei Pan vs Omar Martinez / John Windish6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCharles Stewart / Cameron Hugill vs Scott Naugler / David Bean4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-04-08Lost 02
L#1 SinglesStephen Crook vs Saril Valiyaparambil6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSean McKinnie / Cameron Hugill vs Rob Laing / Mark Bernazzani7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Sean McKinnie
54W–52L career
0%95%5%
3.41
3.5
Greg Mikol
42W–26L career
0%97%3%
3.35
3.5
Cameron Hugill
1W–3L career
not enough data
3.5
Phillip Heaston
0W–5L career
not enough data
3.5
Wei Pan
18W–23L career · type M
2%97%1%
3.25
3.5
Stephen Crook
55W–66L career
2%98%0%
3.21
3
Charles Stewart
37W–61L career
7%87%6%
2.78
0
Kurt Rylander
11W–23L career
not enough data

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.