Teams

Beerman Sassy Smashers - R. Espitia

Polk Casual League · Polk Ladies Casual Play Fall

9 players · average NTRP 3.20 / REGION_4

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Polk Ladies Casual Play Fall have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Jan Borden
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.19
Anna Previte
usually #3 Doubles 32%, also #2 Doubles 28% · published 3.5
3.11
Cynthia Nettles
published 3.5
2.87
Tina Marcewicz
usually #5 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.82
Senita Hanif
published
2.81
Laurie Grieger
published
2.75
Svetlana Darrow
usually #4 Doubles 39%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
2.67
Regina Espitia
published
2.31
Diane Barrera
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jan Borden + Anna Previte3447% gamesnot enough data
Svetlana Darrow + Anna Previte3247% gamesnot enough data
Senita Hanif + Regina Espitia033 matchesnot enough data
Laurie Grieger + Regina Espitia123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jan Borden
40W–45L career · 20 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Anna Previte
99W–73L career · 24 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Cynthia Nettles
2W–9L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
3
Tina Marcewicz
110W–80L career · 13 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
2.87
Senita Hanif
10W–21L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
2.82
Laurie Grieger
12W–18L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
Svetlana Darrow
86W–95L career · 21 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
Regina Espitia
3W–9L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
2.67
2.5
Diane Barrera
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
0%93%7%
2.31

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.