← Teams

MAC-Leedy/Davis

2023 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.55 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Janae Pyle
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.39
Julie Kim
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
—
Wendy Whitsell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Rico McIver
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Alison Davis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.07
Christian Buchholz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
Laura Laney
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.04
Catherine Leedy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.00
Gretchen Wagner
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.91
Nancy Williams
published 3.5
Results8 ties
2022-11-20Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesAlison Davis / Rico McIver vs Katrina Heiles / Rita Arden6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesShawn Cellura Radford / Wendy Whitsell vs Vicki Blunt / Tammy Kitterman6-4, 7-6
2022-11-13Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesDeb Garris / Janae Pyle vs Shirley Derby / Julie Arness0-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChristian Buchholz / Rico McIver vs Ann Wright / Donna Weyand3-6, 6-0, 1-0
2022-11-05Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesCatherine Leedy / Kim Wright vs Karen Pickering / Hong Allen7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDeb Garris / Janae Pyle vs Lorna Goth / Tina Clancy1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCarolyn Bachhuber / Alison Davis vs Pamela Lagielski / Annie Sumpter0-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-10-30Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesJulia Hall / Julie Kim vs Laurence Dupray / Judi Babcock6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDeb Garris / Janae Pyle vs Cynthia Ross-Brockett / Margaret Sivertsen0-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-10-28Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesCatherine Leedy / Mary Murphy vs Mia Birk / Judy Cathcart6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGretchen Wagner / Kim Wright vs Anne Fernando / Sue Griffith6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCarolyn Bachhuber / Julie Kim vs Michele Desmarais / Anne Milan6-1, 6-2
2022-10-23Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesCatherine Leedy / Janae Pyle vs Karen Groenweghe / Denise Angel6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesChristian Buchholz / Gretchen Wagner vs Kathi Gray / Janet Hostetler6-3, 6-4
2022-10-09Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesRico McIver / Julia Hall vs Kim Christensen / Nicole Vedder6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesAlison Davis / Gretchen Wagner vs Kerri Monello / Michelle Jordan4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLaura Laney / Shawn Cellura Radford vs Susan Judge / Christine Keefer6-4, 6-2
2022-09-25Split 1–1
W#2 DoublesAlison Davis / Janae Pyle vs Michelle DeVaughn / Mary Priester6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJulie Kim / Wendy Whitsell vs Dar Dragoon / Michelle Johnson6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Janae Pyle
98W–49L career
0%95%5%
3.39
4
Julie Kim
49W–37L career · type A
61%39%0%
3.39
3.5
Wendy Whitsell
33W–25L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Rico McIver
44W–33L career
8%91%1%
3.20
3.5
Alison Davis
80W–62L career
27%73%1%
3.08
3.5
Christian Buchholz
68W–109L career
16%84%0%
3.07
3.5
Laura Laney
59W–48L career
22%78%0%
3.05
3.5
Catherine Leedy
86W–119L career
23%77%0%
3.04
3.5
Gretchen Wagner
40W–54L career
35%65%0%
3.00
3.5
Nancy Williams
59W–52L career
59%41%0%
2.91

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.