Teams

Mike's 6.0#1

2022 Ekolu League · 6.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MAUI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-10-22vs Mike's 6.0 #2Lost 01
L#1 Female DoublesTricia Kezeli / Shirl Schumacher vs Diane Ho / Jane Sakakihara4-6, 2-6
2022-10-16vs Mike's 6.0 #3Won 10
W#1 Female DoublesRachael Barnard / Barbara Horsman vs Alexa Ballesteros / Lisa Oyama6-1, 6-3
2022-10-08vs Mike's 6.0 #2Split 11
W#1 Female DoublesTricia Kezeli / Shirl Schumacher vs Susan Stewart / Corinne Tanabe6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 Male DoublesDonald Chaikin / Arnold Wunder vs Vicente Andaya / Gary Marshall6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2022-10-02vs Mike's 6.0 #3Lost 01
L#1 Female DoublesRachael Barnard / Barbara Horsman vs Rosemary Bachaus / Melanie Devereux2-6, 4-6
2022-09-18vs Mike's 6.0 #2Split 11
W#1 Female DoublesSusan Bailey / Rachael Barnard vs Corinne Tanabe / Bless Young6-2, 6-1
L#1 Mixed DoublesArnold Wunder / Shirl Schumacher vs Vicente Andaya / Jane Sakakihara1-6, 4-6
2022-09-17vs Mike's 6.0 #3Split 11
L#1 Female DoublesMargaret Lawson / Shirl Schumacher vs Rosemary Bachaus / Alexa Ballesteros3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 Mixed DoublesDonald Chaikin / Tricia Kezeli vs Brendon Velasco / Lisa Oyama6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Mike's 6.0#14210817134
2Mike's 6.0 #2339919167
3Mike's 6.0 #32481021168

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Fritz Schneider
published 3.5
2.93
Tricia Kezeli
usually #1 Female Doubles 67%, also #1 Mixed Doubles 33% · published 3
2.92
Barbara Horsman
published 3
2.92
Donald Chaikin
published 3
2.81
Rachael Barnard
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 3
2.66
Shirl Schumacher
usually #1 Female Doubles 75%, also #1 Mixed Doubles 25% · published 3
2.49
Arnold Wunder
usually #1 Mixed Doubles 50%, also #1 Male Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Kevin Madaya
published
Margaret Lawson
published
Michael Kinoshita
published
Susan Bailey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shirl Schumacher + Tricia Kezeli123 matchesnot enough data
Tricia Kezeli + Barbara Horsman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Fritz Schneider
4W–5L career · type A · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Tricia Kezeli
69W–98L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
2.93
3
Barbara Horsman
40W–21L career · no lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Donald Chaikin
18W–42L career · type A · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Rachael Barnard
45W–57L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%92%8%
2.81
3
Shirl Schumacher
36W–60L career · 4 lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
2.66
2.5
Arnold Wunder
20W–52L career · type M · 2 lines in 2022
0%52%48%
2.49
Kevin Madaya
9W–17L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Margaret Lawson
7W–12L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Michael Kinoshita
30W–63L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Susan Bailey
18W–29L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.