Teams

LLSC-Scherrman/Jetton

2024 Lake USTA 18 & Over League · Women 4.5

11 players · average NTRP 4.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-04-30vs LJSZI-Szilagyi/RRWon 10
W#2 DoublesLori Scherrman / Janet Marek vs Janet Szilagyi / Ana Endsjo6-2, 6-3
2024-04-23vs LMTA-Tautjo-KMilligan/JettonLost 01
L#2 DoublesLori Scherrman / Kirsty Donaldson-Roach vs Bridget Castoria / Fumiyo Ono4-6, 2-6
2024-04-02vs LMTA-Tautjo-KMilligan/JettonLost 01
L#1 DoublesLori Scherrman / Susan Davis vs Fumiyo Ono / Karen Daniels-Lynch6-7, 3-6
2024-03-19vs LJSZI-Szilagyi/RRLost 01
L#2 DoublesTammy Knowles / Lynn Chambers vs Morgan Hawk / Phebby Benton4-6, 1-6
2024-03-12vs LMTA-Tautjo-KMilligan/JettonWon 10
W#1 DoublesRobin Dann / Kelly Arzonico vs Bridget Castoria / Danielle Delancey6-1, 6-3
2024-03-08vs LJSZI-Szilagyi/RRLost 02
L#1 DoublesBritt Ruby / Lynn Chambers vs Jayne May / Bonnie Newell6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesLori Scherrman vs Michelle Turk1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.01 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.35
Kelly Arzonico
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.26
Lori Scherrman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.21
Elizabeth Berley
published
4.19
Britt Ruby
published 4.5
4.04
Robin Dann
published
4.04
Lynn Chambers
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.86
3.79
Tammy Knowles
published
3.78
Janet Marek
published
C E Swanson
published 4
3.57
Anya Balcerzak
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lynn Chambers + Britt Ruby5074% games+10.1% vs expected
Lori Scherrman + Kelly Arzonico6165% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Kelly Arzonico
92W–13L career · 1 line in 2024
1%85%14%
4.35
4.5
Lori Scherrman
133W–74L career · 4 lines in 2024
3%92%4%
4.26
Elizabeth Berley
7W–2L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
4.21
4.5
Britt Ruby
6W–0L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
4.19
Robin Dann
6W–2L career · no lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
4.04
4.5
Lynn Chambers
116W–77L career · 2 lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
4.04
Kirsty Donaldson-Roach
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
3.86
Tammy Knowles
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.79
Janet Marek
0W–5L career · no lines in 2024
94%6%<1%
3.78
4
C E Swanson
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Anya Balcerzak
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.57

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.