Teams

Sailfish Point/Frazier

2025 IRMSL Adult 18 & Over Day Spring · 3.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.20 / REGION_6

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-06-16vs Quail/GarciaLost 02
L#1 DoublesLeigh Pisani / Shannon King vs Sara Lloyd / Susan Hofstetter3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDonna Barr / Donna Frazier vs Kristin Notte / Pia Gold6-7, 3-6
2025-05-14vs Quail/GarciaLost 13
L#1 DoublesKelli Lentine / Shannon King vs Julia Durham / Eliot Foote2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesDaniela Potter vs Kristin Notte6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesTeri Gonzalez / Loretta Doctor vs Sara Lloyd / Susan Hofstetter3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLinda Cullere / Donna Frazier vs Rachel Leyda / Cassy West4-6, 6-7
2025-04-23vs Quail/GarciaSplit 22
W#1 DoublesLoretta Doctor / Kathleen LaRocco vs Julia Durham / Laurie Connelly6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDaniela Potter vs Kristin Notte6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAlena McDonough / Leigh Pisani vs Sara Lloyd / Elke Higgins2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesCindy Liptrot / Teri Gonzalez vs Rachel Leyda / Jennifer Malone Watson2-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alena McDonough
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Daniela Potter
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Kathleen LaRocco
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Donna Frazier
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Cindy Liptrot
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Donna Barr
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Kelli Lentine
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Leigh Pisani
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Linda Cullere
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Loretta Doctor
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Teri Gonzalez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Alena McDonough
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Daniela Potter
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kathleen LaRocco
7W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
3
Donna Frazier
6W–15L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.06
3
Cindy Liptrot
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Donna Barr
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kelli Lentine
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Leigh Pisani
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Linda Cullere
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Loretta Doctor
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Teri Gonzalez
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.