Teams

UPTA18FF/Samuel-Posta/Southside

2025 Fun Fall 18 & over - GTL · 3.0 Women FF

11 players · average NTRP 2.75 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-11-14vs UPTA18FF/Zeimetz/PavilionLost 05
L#1 DoublesKaty Davidson / Natallia Sianko vs JB Robinson / Cady Johnson3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesCara Morris vs Keeley Mezzancello3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesEunice Samuel / Joye Rogers vs Shellie Corley / Heather Lynn1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesAnne Spinelli vs Meg Powers0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRachael Cariveau / Gloria Bleasdale vs Sandy Shaw / Ashley Rehn2-6, 4-6
2025-11-07vs UPTA18FF/Walters/HollyTreeWon 41
W#1 DoublesNatallia Sianko / Cara Morris vs Grae Turner / Suzy Clary4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKaty Davidson vs Tabitha Taylor1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesEmily Goforth / Elizabeth Mccutchen vs Alicia Walters / Blair Brading5-7, 1-6
W#2 SinglesEunice Samuel vs Jillian Jensen7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRachael Cariveau / Joye Rogers vs Gretchen Lawson / Tarah M Smith6-2, 6-4
2025-10-31vs UPTA18FF/Busby/Frank/GCCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesEunice Samuel / Cara Morris vs Molly Netzler / Laura Whitney4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGloria Bleasdale / Rachael Cariveau vs Lauren Barber / Holly Sellers4-6, 5-7
2025-10-24vs UPTA18FF/Blum/GCCLost 13
L#1 SinglesCara Morris vs Val Kahler5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Mccutchen / Rachael Cariveau vs Katherine Mattice / Leslie Ingram4-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesAnne Spinelli vs Paige Hawks0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesGloria Bleasdale / Katy Davidson vs Hanna Lane / Riley Bignon6-3, 6-2
2025-10-17vs UPTA18FF/Foss/Hwy14Won 41
W#1 DoublesKaty Davidson / Rachael Cariveau vs Hannah Martin / Tracey MacDonald6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesCara Morris vs Rebecca Foss6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAnne Spinelli / Elizabeth Mccutchen vs Angie Hill / Sarah Hansen4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 SinglesEmily Goforth vs Rachel Graeber6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesGloria Bleasdale / Joye Rogers vs Anna Brown / Julie Cain Cwynar7-6, 6-0
2025-10-10vs UPTA18FF/Benfield/Sugar CreekLost 05
L#1 DoublesAnne Spinelli / Emily Goforth vs Erin Benfield / Lindsey New5-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Mccutchen vs Maria Batista2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKaty Davidson / Eunice Samuel vs Erin McArthur / Marissa Moore3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesKara Paulk vs Megan Tollison4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCara Morris / Rachael Cariveau vs Judy Niver / Mary Nunes3-6, 4-6
2025-10-03vs UPTA18FF/Pelino/PavillionSplit 22
W#1 DoublesEunice Samuel / Rachael Cariveau vs Tracy Chastain / Kerra McAdams6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKaty Davidson vs Elizabeth Faulkner6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesEmily Goforth / Anne Spinelli vs Gina Pelino / Shelly James3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesElizabeth Mccutchen vs Brie Soler4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women FF have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.53 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.83
Natallia Sianko
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.67
Cara Morris
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.59
Katy Davidson
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.58
Elizabeth Mccutchen
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 2.5
2.52
Gloria Bleasdale
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.50
Emily Goforth
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 2.5
2.49
Eunice Samuel
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.31
Kara Paulk
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.31
Rachael Cariveau
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Anne Spinelli
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 2.5
Joye Rogers
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gloria Bleasdale + Rachael Cariveau044 matchesnot enough data
Katy Davidson + Gloria Bleasdale123 matchesnot enough data
Katy Davidson + Eunice Samuel123 matchesnot enough data
Eunice Samuel + Natallia Sianko213 matchesnot enough data
Emily Goforth + Anne Spinelli123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Natallia Sianko
22W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
2.83
3
Cara Morris
15W–27L career · 6 lines in 2025
10%90%1%
2.67
Katy Davidson
8W–20L career · 6 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
2.59
2.5
Elizabeth Mccutchen
2W–8L career · type S · 7 lines in 2025
0%26%74%
2.58
3
Gloria Bleasdale
7W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
2.52
2.5
Emily Goforth
4W–4L career · type S · 5 lines in 2025
0%49%51%
2.50
3
Eunice Samuel
9W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
2.49
Kara Paulk
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%92%8%
2.31
Rachael Cariveau
15W–29L career · 7 lines in 2025
0%93%7%
2.31
2.5
Anne Spinelli
3W–5L career · type S · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Joye Rogers
2W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.