Teams

Blalock/18/2.5/M/SOAC

2026 City Championship 18 & Over - Men · 2.5 (18&O) Men

4 players · average NTRP 2.50 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings6 teams · 2.5 (18&O) Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Caruso/18/2.5/M/BREC000000
2Blalock/18/2.5/M/SOAC000000
3Breaux/18/2.5/M/BREC000000
4Wilbert/18/2.5/M/BREC000000
5Chenevert/18/2.5/M/BREC000000
6Wilmot/18/2.5/M/Legy000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.31 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.36
Luke Blalock
published
2.34
Saleh Babazadeh
published
2.33
Paul Berniard
published
2.22
Gerard Dynes
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Luke Blalock + Paul Berniard123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Luke Blalock
16W–27L career · no lines in 2026
0%86%14%
2.36
Saleh Babazadeh
20W–32L career · no lines in 2026
0%89%11%
2.34
Paul Berniard
12W–29L career · no lines in 2026
0%91%9%
2.33
2.5
Gerard Dynes
9W–19L career · no lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.22

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.