Teams

LT

2021 CTA TWILIGHT - NOCO · WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT - NOCO

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-09-15vs LVTALost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Rogers / Janice Sale vs Sandra Christensen / Tristan Barbattini3-6, 4-6
2021-09-08vs HMTCLost 01
L#1 DoublesJanet Krech / Bernita Sterling vs Debbie Hansen / Vivian Watson2-6, 2-6
2021-08-25vs TAGWon 10
W#1 SinglesJanice Sale vs Pat Sprock6-4, 7-5
2021-08-18vs MLF YELLOWLost 01
L#1 DoublesBernita Sterling / Ewa Pawlak vs Wendy Sprague / Sarah Hay-Arthur5-7, 2-6
2021-08-11vs MLF PURPLELost 01
L#1 DoublesDeborah Lockwood / Janice Sale vs Leticia Dunn / Brittney Stephenson2-6, 5-7
2021-08-04vs FCCC REDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMary Rogers / Janice Sale vs Molly Skold / Kara Brown6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJanet Krech vs Denise Benz6-2, 6-3
2021-07-28vs FCCC GREENSplit 11
W#1 SinglesJanet Krech vs Maka Hammock7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCristine Carpenter / Bernita Sterling vs Kristie Steinbock / Sherry McCoy4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.83
Janice Sale
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.76
Janet Krech
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Deborah Lockwood
published 3
2.66
2.56
Bernita Sterling
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.35
Ewa Pawlak
published 3
Peggy Nowak
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janice Sale + Cristine Carpenter8553% games+9.3% vs expected
Bernita Sterling + Cristine Carpenter4446% games+1.8% vs expected
Janice Sale + Janet Krech91149% games−2.6% vs expected
Janice Sale + Bernita Sterling101450% games−3.6% vs expected
Janice Sale + Deborah Lockwood3352% gamesnot enough data
Janet Krech + Bernita Sterling044 matchesnot enough data
Peggy Nowak + Ewa Pawlak213 matchesnot enough data
Janet Krech + Cristine Carpenter033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Janice Sale
95W–103L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%89%10%
2.83
3
Janet Krech
43W–51L career · 3 lines in 2021
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Deborah Lockwood
35W–17L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Cristine Carpenter
24W–29L career · no lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
2.66
3
Bernita Sterling
71W–106L career · 3 lines in 2021
32%67%<1%
2.56
3
Ewa Pawlak
2W–11L career · type S · no lines in 2021
88%12%<1%
2.35
Peggy Nowak
3W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.