Teams

Miller 4.0

2022 Frederick Adult 18 & Over · Frederick Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.94 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-06-13vs Connelly 4.0 18+Won 10
W#1 DoublesCecelia Biesecker / Susan Spector vs Stephanie Almeida / Lisa McIntire6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-06-09vs Connelly 4.0 18+Won 10
W#1 DoublesSusan Spector / Cecelia Biesecker vs Kerry Spicer / Pamela Dean3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-06-08vs WellsLost 01
L#1 DoublesElona Novitski / Mekkla Thompson vs Lacey Gordon / Jana Conigliaro6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2022-05-23vs Connelly 4.0 18+Won 10
W#1 DoublesCecelia Biesecker / Susan Spector vs Angie Martin / Jaime Lewis6-4, 6-2
2022-05-19vs WellsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesChristina Truax / Cecelia Biesecker vs Jana Conigliaro / Amy Dipasquale6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesElona Novitski / Mekkla Thompson vs Julie Edwards / Kimberly Wells6-2, 6-2
2022-05-14vs Connelly 4.0 18+Won 10
W#1 DoublesElona Novitski / Mekkla Thompson vs Kerry Spicer / Quynh Tran6-1, 6-3
2022-05-10Won 10
W#1 DoublesCecelia Biesecker / Susan Spector vs Kimberly Wells / Julie Edwards6-4, 6-3
2022-05-03vs Connelly 4.0 18+Won 10
W#1 DoublesCecelia Biesecker / Susan Spector vs Stephanie Almeida / Angie Martin2-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Frederick Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Mekkla Thompson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.90
Evelyn Chan
published 4
3.82
Joy Oliver
published
Elona Novitski
published 4
3.67
Cecelia Biesecker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Laura Henmueller
published 4
3.53
Susan Spector
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.53
Christina Truax
published 4
3.50
Sabrina Alban
published
3.28
Cora Ho
published 3.5
Millette Miller
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Henmueller + Cora Ho41241% gamesnot enough data
Cecelia Biesecker + Susan Spector6155% gamesnot enough data
Laura Henmueller + Mekkla Thompson224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Mekkla Thompson
161W–109L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%67%32%
3.94
4
Evelyn Chan
22W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.90
Joy Oliver
15W–10L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Elona Novitski
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Cecelia Biesecker
130W–122L career · 6 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Laura Henmueller
121W–170L career · no lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.63
4
Susan Spector
321W–248L career · 5 lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
3.53
4
Christina Truax
3W–8L career · no lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
3.53
Sabrina Alban
19W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%50%50%
3.50
3.5
Cora Ho
120W–87L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.28
Millette Miller
7W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.