Teams

Eagle Harbor - Dill

2021 Duval Adult 40 & Over - Women · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over

13 players · average NTRP 3.40 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-05-23vs Jax Golf - CarrLost 01
L#1 DoublesKimberly Schoof / Donna DeBerry vs Susan Chiang / Deborah O'Leary1-6, 1-6
2021-04-26vs JCA - SeekerWon 10
W#1 DoublesJolene Hamel / Kimberly Schoof vs Kelly Cusick / Staci Hill3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-03-14vs Southside - JohnsonWon 10
W#2 DoublesKimberly Schoof / Jolene Hamel vs Stainya Young / Hillary Berry6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2021-03-13vs Ponte Vedra - CleekLost 01
L#1 DoublesDonna DeBerry / Kimberly Schoof vs Jennifer Cleek / Jane Wahl4-6, 0-6
2021-02-07vs San Jose - HennessyWon 10
W#2 DoublesKimberly Schoof / Donna DeBerry vs Catherine Decunto / Nancy Hanna6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2021-01-24Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMary Knox / Kimberly Schoof vs Kimberly Gore / Paula Reynolds4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2021-01-17vs FYC - VanderHeydenWon 10
W#2 DoublesMary Knox / Kimberly Schoof vs Ginger Vanderheyden / Sheri Carryl6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Heather Kibbe
published 3.5
Andrea Sullivan
published 3.5
3.24
Jill Schmidt
published
3.22
3.22
Lori Aiosa
published
3.21
Greta Pacilio
published 3.5
3.15
Stefannie Godfrey
published
3.15
Jolene Hamel
published
3.01
Shelly Hamilton
published
Cristina Thomas
published 3
Julie Stofan
published
Kellie Philips
published
Kimberly Schoof
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Greta Pacilio + Heather Kibbe224 matchesnot enough data
Jolene Hamel + Cynthia Roland-Murray213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Heather Kibbe
9W–4L career · no lines in 2021
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Andrea Sullivan
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Jill Schmidt
5W–5L career · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Cynthia Roland-Murray
3W–2L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.22
Lori Aiosa
5W–6L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.22
3.5
Greta Pacilio
7W–5L career · no lines in 2021
5%93%1%
3.21
Stefannie Godfrey
2W–3L career · no lines in 2021
12%87%<1%
3.15
Jolene Hamel
15W–16L career · no lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
3.15
Shelly Hamilton
2W–4L career · no lines in 2021
48%52%<1%
3.01
3
Cristina Thomas
1W–0L career · type S · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Julie Stofan
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Kellie Philips
5W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Kimberly Schoof
36W–35L career · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.