← Teams

CRRC-Franke/Walker

2024 Adult 65 & Over · 7.0 Women

2 players · average NTRP 3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
Donna Walker
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.96
Gina Ariosa
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Results5 ties
2024-05-16Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesGina Ariosa / Gail Roche vs Carolyn Bachhuber / Alexa Haskard2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-04-04Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesKaren Franke / Gina Ariosa vs Judy van Gasse / Shelley Laurance6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesWendie Nowacki / Donna Walker vs Cathy Zagunis / Merry Pettis6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2024-03-29Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesDonna Walker / Carol Spencer vs Jana Hirst / Patricia Brink6-3, 6-0
2024-03-21Split 1–1
L#2 DoublesLinda Castaneda / Donna Walker vs Kathi Gray / Denise Angel6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesGail Roche / Gina Ariosa vs Pauline Reilly / Susan Lively7-6, 6-0
2024-03-15Lost 0–2
L#2 DoublesGina Ariosa / Gail Roche vs Kathleen Budnick / Jan Funkhouser3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDonna Walker / Priscilla Connolly vs Sharon Reese / Kathleen Murrin6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Donna Walker
12W–38L career
0%64%36%
3.04
3
Gina Ariosa
24W–46L career
0%80%20%
2.96

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.