Teams

FLYTE RC 18AM4.5A

2025 ADULT 18&Over · Men's 4.5

21 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
W#1 DoublesPaul Sampognaro / Geoffrey Gerding vs Ricky Herzog / Tycho Lamberigts6-2, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.10 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.47
Jack Harrington
published
4.41
FABIAN KOSINSKI
published
4.31
Andrew Loft
published 4.5
4.29
Kevin Keenley
published
4.29
Raul Sananes
published
4.28
Geoffrey Gerding
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.23
Richard Khoe
published
4.22
Caben Chester
published 4.5
4.19
Elliot Diamond
published
4.18
Bennett Gazor
published 4.5
4.13
Olivier Picault
published
4.10
Robert Herbst
published
4.09
Sacha Drazien
published
4.05
Michael Mascott
published
3.98
Devin Hedrick
published 4.5
3.81
Leo Bersamina
published
3.80
Jake Pollak
published
3.79
Thomas Schmidt
published
3.71
Jason Lytz
published
3.70
Howard Schnirman
published
Thomas Mayes
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elliot Diamond + Raul Sananes213 matchesnot enough data
Sacha Drazien + Olivier Picault303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jack Harrington
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.47
FABIAN KOSINSKI
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
4.41
4.5
Andrew Loft
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
4.31
Kevin Keenley
6W–1L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
4.29
Raul Sananes
7W–13L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
4.29
Geoffrey Gerding
13W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
4.28
Richard Khoe
13W–5L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
4.23
4.5
Caben Chester
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
4.22
Elliot Diamond
12W–6L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
4.19
4.5
Bennett Gazor
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
4.18
Olivier Picault
16W–5L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
4.13
Robert Herbst
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
4.10
Sacha Drazien
15W–7L career · no lines in 2025
26%73%<1%
4.09
Michael Mascott
11W–2L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
4.05
4.5
Devin Hedrick
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
3.98
Leo Bersamina
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
Jake Pollak
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
Thomas Schmidt
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
93%7%<1%
3.79
Jason Lytz
9W–7L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
Howard Schnirman
7W–25L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Thomas Mayes
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.