Teams

KBrown 40+ 7.6W

2022 Piedmont Combo 40 & Over · 7.5 Women 40 & Over

15 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-09-28vs Albright 40+ 7.5WWon 10
W#2 DoublesJacqueline Herron / Sallye Parker vs Fuyuka Lynch / Emily Wilson6-2, 6-2
2022-09-14vs Pace 40+ 7.5WWon 10
W#3 DoublesJacqueline Herron / Sallye Parker vs Lisa Shy / Mary Batts6-2, 6-0
2022-08-31Lost 01
L#2 DoublesSallye Parker / Carolyn Pellerin vs Melissa Goodman / Cheryl Scott1-6, 3-6
2022-08-17vs Eagan/Mcelreath 40+ 7.5WWon 10
W#2 DoublesShawn McFarlin / Vangie Cruz vs Chris Amos / Anne Thornton7-5, 6-2
2022-08-11vs Pekarne 40+ 7.5WWon 10
W#2 DoublesSallye Parker / Marsha Tice vs Libby Strickland / Elaine Ashley6-2, 6-1
2022-08-03vs BECK - 40+ 7.5WWon 10
W#1 DoublesJacqueline Herron / Shawn McFarlin vs Betty Kramer / Karen Olson6-7, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Shawn McFarlin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.76
Tara Burgio
published
3.70
Ann Evans
published 4
3.66
Kathryn Egerton
published
3.60
Carolyn Pellerin
published 4
3.59
Sallye Parker
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
3.54
Minerva Loran
published
3.49
Jacqueline Herron
published 3.5
3.37
Marsha Tice
published
3.35
Tammie Hughes
published
3.33
Vangie Cruz
published
3.32
Kathy Brown
published
3.28
Krisla Berreth
published
3.18
Theresa Atchison
published
Janet Fortney
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jacqueline Herron + Krisla Berreth123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shawn McFarlin
184W–155L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.79
Tara Burgio
12W–8L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.76
4
Ann Evans
24W–17L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
Kathryn Egerton
14W–15L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.66
4
Carolyn Pellerin
8W–5L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.60
Sallye Parker
146W–124L career · 7 lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.59
Minerva Loran
13W–18L career · no lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.54
3.5
Jacqueline Herron
36W–29L career · no lines in 2022
<1%54%46%
3.49
Marsha Tice
20W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%15%
3.37
Tammie Hughes
23W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
3.35
Vangie Cruz
21W–19L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
Kathy Brown
14W–22L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
Krisla Berreth
24W–16L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.28
Theresa Atchison
16W–7L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
Janet Fortney
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.